|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
03-28-2011, 05:21 PM
Quote:
By the way, how old are you? I guess 14-16. Es ist nicht schön verzweifelte Menschen noch mehr zu verunsichern. Der Mann/die Frau steckt bestimmt in viel Stress und kann die Situation nicht richtig einschätzen. Falls du nichts Besseres zu tun hast, finde dir ein anderes Hobby. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
03-28-2011, 05:31 PM
Quote:
 |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
03-28-2011, 05:38 PM
Quote:
 |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
03-28-2011, 06:01 PM
Quote:
Atom lobbyists all around the world try to cover up the consequences. There are no other explanations for different reports in Europe (more facts), USA ( less facts) and Japan( alot less facts). I wrote it in previous post. Basically, any modern nuclear plant can turn into Fukushima if they are cut off from their energy source long enough. There are so many possibilities for it to happen, a plane crush, tsunami or whatsever are enough to do the job.People don't realize the danger or try to ignore it because of economy. What they don't know, spent fuel rods have to be isolated for as long as 25000 years. It means people have to make sure that there are no leakages in containments for that huge period of time. The costs are astronomical actually if you include the containment in it. Who does pay it? The government!!! The energy concerns get the profits, stuff the mouth of politicians with money and we pay for the consequenses. Also, there were and are a huge number of projects for alternative energy but they are blocked or hindered by oil and nuclear energy lobbyists from the very begining, patents are bought and put into a drawer with no use. How do you expect them to be developed? All that you hear from them is that nuclear energy is the cleanest (lol), cheapest(even bigger lol) source and that alternative energy is not the real deal... |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
03-28-2011, 06:18 PM
Quote:
 |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
03-28-2011, 06:19 PM
Quote:
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
03-28-2011, 06:24 PM
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
03-28-2011, 06:28 PM
Now, what I feared the most happened:
Source Plutonium leakage outside of containment! Now, whoever wants to defend TEPCO or the Japanese goverment's press statements has no grounds anymore. 1. Plutonium leakage means that the meltdown occured many days ago. 2. They say, the concentration is not dangerous enough! 1 nanogram inhalated Plutonium is already super toxic. 2 lies, first the meltdown didn't happen today but days ago and second plutonium is dangerous in any amounts free in nature.I had my doubts about them but now I can prove it.Once again: Any Japanese who reads it LEAVE THE AREA 80KM AROUND FUKUSHIMA immediatly! For explanations, read the last 3 pages. You risk everything staying there, nothing is more worth than your health or your familiy's! |
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
03-29-2011, 07:56 AM
First:
Plutonium is a primordial element, in other words it has existed in nature long before nuclear power plants or any man made nuclear anything was devised. Second: The nuclear weapon used to destroy Nagasaki used plutonium 239, which according to your level of paranoia would have caused a global genocide of humanity, or at the very least Nagasaki would be uninhabitable. Third: Fallout from thousands of nuclear tests around the world contain far more than simply traces of plutonium, people now live in and around these places. Fourth: "no human is known to have died because of inhaling or ingesting plutonium, and many people have measurable amounts of plutonium in their bodies" (WNA, World Nuclear Association, check Plutonium Wiki) The stuff is not nearly as dangerous as you make it out to be, it takes ludicrous amounts of it to kill people, perhaps workers are at risk but the general population even in a decent proximity to it is far from being at risk. Fifth: A commonly cited quote by Ralph Nader, states that a pound of plutonium dust spread into the atmosphere would be enough to kill 8 billion people. However, the math shows that only up to 2 million people can be killed by inhaling plutonium. This makes the toxicity of plutonium roughly equivalent with that of nerve gas. (check wiki, sourced) Sixth: Several populations of people who have been exposed to plutonium dust (e.g. people living down-wind of Nevada test sites, Hiroshima survivors, nuclear facility workers, and "terminally ill" patients injected with Pu in 1945–46 to study Pu metabolism) have been carefully followed and analyzed. These studies generally do not show especially high plutonium toxicity or plutonium-induced cancer results.[88] "There were about 25 workers from Los Alamos National Laboratory who inhaled a considerable amount of plutonium dust during the 1940's; according to the hot-particle theory, each of them has a 99.5% chance of being dead from lung cancer by now, but there has not been a single lung cancer among them." (from wiki, sourced) Please reply with logic, preferably based on fact, not emotion. |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
wake up
