Ok, its already been pointed out that your sources are questionable. They are certainly not well know for unbiased or full researched information.
But following that you resorted to what a best is sophistry, at worst character assination. I am not really a supporter of Obama, but I am vehmently opposed to this sort of negative propopganda.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RegPaq
I believe Obama's secret shame at his family history of rape, murder and arson is what actualizes him.
However, I must admit, his meteoric rise does concern me. He is charismatic, no doubt. But, one of the things I have always thought was important about the process by which America selects its leaders is that it is rare for a leader to come out of nowhere, ascending to high political position without an extensive and well-known political history.
|
And just how much did you know about George W. Bush before he was put in office? I will bet you didn't know anything more than his own 5 escond sound bites. If you had, you would have been mortified that he would even be considered a viable candidate.
For that matter what did anyone know about Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton before his presidential campaign, outside of those of us who lived in neighboring states? I will bet you only knew who Reagan was because of old movies, until his presidential campaign.
Obama is not a necomer to politics coming out of nowhere. You apparently don't live in his constituency is all.
And as for bringing in the reputation of a candidates family - well GW is nothing like HIS father, unfortunately for us!