Quote:
Originally Posted by ivi0nk3y
No, Iraq was invaded primarily because it was in the interest of companies such as Halliburton and its ties with the American Government.
I'm sure you know how my example is just the tip of the iceberg.
|
Oh I cannot disagree with this at all. I've been familiar with Halliburton since before anyone outside of Texas ever heard of the "shrub" and the former CEO of Halliburton that is now in Washington.
I was referring to deposing those leaders as the justification, not necessarily the real reason behind the plan. And yes, both were left without any real powerbase to step into place, so the ones with the most ammo are the ones really in charge.