Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin4hire
I'm sorry but that's a huge and completely unscientific conclusion you've jumped to. You're going to have to define what constitutes a pure bloodline and then give me an example of a nation which is "pure" for me to understand that.
Again... There is no measurable physical or genetic difference between a Han Chinese, Korean or a Japanese. This is a scientific fact whether you believe otherwise or not.
I think we do... and I think that these distinctions come under the regional tendencies I was talking about.
|
I am not a scientist, so any conclusion I come up with will be unscietific.
That being said, Japan was closed off to foreigners until a few generations ago, so there was, and in many ways still is a "pure blood line" in terms that you had a group of people that went for many generations without any outside genepool mixing.
Again, I don't know how you can say there is no "measurable difference" where gene and DNA science is so knew. That's like saying there is no measurable different between a Korean and African brain. Well, just because we don't have the tools doesn't mean there isn't a difference.
Kenyans don't "tend to" be black. They are black. Japanese don't "tend to" have black hair. They have black hair.
I am not quite sure what you are getting at.