Quote:
Originally Posted by MissMisa
Unfortunatly Koir, if the Serious Discussion had absolutely no requirements, it would just end up like all the other threads that have been classed as Serious Discussion - spammed in, argued in and then for the people who are debating are the ones effected when the whole thread is deleted. We need to have some kind of restrictions on which people are able to post in such forums, otherwise there would be no point in at all, which I think there is. Our debates have been spoiled by immature members for long enough - I'm sure if this kind of topic ever came about, we could ask members which would be the most appropriate. 100 posts, 500 posts, 1000 posts to gain access, having to PM a moderator, or simply being here for a long period of time, whether it be 10 days or 30. These are all specifics that need to be voted on and are not yet to be set in stone.
|
None of those things are going to keep down immature arguments.
The only way to do that is give people who want to be immature a place to be immature.
Like I suggested in my original post.
The only thing those restrictions well do is seperate old members from the new.
Which is just down right wrong.