[ivi0nk3y]

Originally Posted by Tenchu

• Morality is no incentive to help a dieing child. Moarals vary from person to person. Someone turning their back on something that is important to you does not mean they are immoral, just different.

Says who? There are good morals, bad morals, few morals and more morals. Whether they differ from person to person is irrelevant. The majority of people will help a suffering child in front of them. People who won't either don't have morals or bad morals and it's as simple as that.

Originally Posted by Tenchu

• Africans and Indians do not make so many babies because it increases their chance of survival, actually it s quite the opposite, and children of poor familes are 95% of the time for sale for the smallest of prices. Noodle suggested that it was for survival, maybe in the past, but not now days. They have children now because they are idiots.

So whats changed "nowadays". People still need to survive and if those kids are for sale, then it's to do with getting money, hence survival.
Having so many children now is idiotic but that just doesn't rest well with me as a good enough answer.

Originally Posted by Tenchu

• Man is prone to stupidity on the larger scale. Even well educated countries are still full of idiots in the wide sense you are reffering to. If you did manage to change peoples minds on this subject it would just make them blind to another equally as important subject. This is the Way of the common people, it is stupidity.

Yes man is prone to stupidity and its that base stupidity that educating and growing in a wholesome society will get rid of. At the least there will be "less stupid people".

Originally Posted by Tenchu

• I dont need to take part in the solution. I am not part of the community of this world, I am not part of your suffering horde. I am the scavenger/hunter that feasts upon your arrogance and weakness. I will be content just to exist as I am, in either world, I dont need change, but I dont mind if it happens..

Oh ok. Lucky you I guess.