[Sangetsu]

Originally Posted by Tenchu

Are you serious? For what its worth, I don't go to school, and when I did, it was only computing, math and English. I study in my own time, and to say I am quoting shit straight out of things like "An Inconveniant Truth" is absolute bull shit. Thanks for resorting to the level of trying to demean someone instead of actually debating. It really shows your character.

Actually, as far as I can tell, you've been quoting a bunch of "facts" you've picked up from some finnancially, politically, or religously motivated organization. They don't sound right to me, not at all. I think this because you are posting subjects in unconnecting paragraphs; your facts don't connect, you have no theory, and it seems from that you lack a base, which is what most of these people lack, also.

For what it's worth, education has value, otherwise who would bother with the time and expense of attending university?

As for financially or politically motivated, those words could be used to describe the UN. Since the global warming farce began, more than $1,000,000,000,000 has been spent by the world's governments to grapple with the problem. The US alone is spending $29 billion a year for climate change research. Who do you think is profiting from this money?

Since you asked for facts, theory, and a base, I'll provide them. Please have the courtesy to read, if you are capable of it.

First, a genuine record of earth's temperatures

World Climate Report

Second, a paper refuting the IPCC's claim that Co2 levels are climbing to historic levels, and that Co2 has any significant effect on the world's temperature

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.co...O2_Scandal.pdf

Next, a real life chart of sea ice levels. The data only goes back as far as 1979, we do not know what the levels were in the 1930's, which was the period when world temperatures were recorded at their highest levels

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosph....withtrend.jpg

This article has to do with sea level rise, or the lack thereof. It is authored by arguably the world's leading authority on the subject

FAEC -

Since many people here seemed to have learned much of what they know about global warming from Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth", it should be noted that the British Supreme Court found and ruled on 9 inconsistencies in the movie. "An Inconvenient Truth" is no longer considered a documentary of fact by the United Kingdom, but a political/editorial film. Read excerpts here

Global Warming Science and Public Policy - 35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore

The UN and the IPCC have a vested interest in maintaining the global warming "myth". Prior to the publishing of the 1996 IPCC report, three important clauses were removed from the final draft, these were:

# "None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed [climate] chang

es to the specific cause of increases in greenhouse gases."

# "No study to date has positively attributed all or part [of the climate change observed to date] to anthropogenic [man- made] causes."

# "Any claims of positive detection of significant climate change are likely to remain controversial until uncertainties in the total natural variability of the climate system are reduced."

Here is a link the the article, written by S Fred Singer, who was the IPCC's lead author in the 1996 report

Letter to IPCC Scientists

I've posted my facts and my base, those who have contrary evidence, please feel free to present it.