[Ronin4hire]

Originally Posted by ozkai

To be honest, It seems a done thing now in the Western World as their is evidence to suggest the clean factor and less risk of disease.

As far as sexual enhancent, I'm done and I can tell you it works me wonders

You are right.. Muslim and Jewish people have it done..

I had my little Kai done here and he didn't mind.. It was over in a few seconds..

It is a very personal thing and some want it, are concenrend either way, and every individual makes up their own mind..

I however think that it is barbaric to have a girl done, taking away such a pleasure spot and for some strange reason without knowing, must be EXTREMELY painful considering the sensitive nature of the clitoris..

The little boys foreskin before three months is very soft and lacks nerves..

You're talking bullsh*t. Statistics say that apart from the US circumcision is declining and is currently ranges from low to virtually none in most Western countries.
As for uncircumcised penises being "better in bed". Being circumcised or not makes little mechanical difference to the penis and erect you wouldn't be able to tell as the foreskin automatically folds back. So your opinion is really just a personal preference. I'm actually intrigued as to what about circumcised ones makes the better?

Incidence of Male Meonatal Circumcision in New Zealand.

Circumcision Statistics for New Zealand

At the present time the incidence of neonatal circumcision in New Zealand is very low. In fact, it may be the lowest of all English speaking nations. A circumcision rate of 0.35% was reported in 1995 in public hospitals.

Incidence of Circumcision in Canada

Canada

While the incidence of neonatal male circumcision varies sharply by region in Canada, the overall incidence of neonatal male circumcision is decreasing throughout Canada. Prince Edward Island (PEI) reported the highest incidence, but Newfoundland/Labrador reported no circumcisions in 2003. Quebec and the Atlantic provinces traditionally have had a low incidence of male neonatal circumcision (except for PEI).5

Circumcision and Non-circumcision in Australia

Australia

The Medicare statistics of the Department of Health provide information on the number of claims for male circumcision. O'Donnell has studied these claims. In 2004, the incidence of male neonatal circumcision in Australia was stable at about 12.7 percent, which means that genital integrity was preserved for 87.3 percent of boys born in that year.14 O'Donnell reports sharp divisions by state. Tasmania was the lowest at 3.9 percent, while Queenland was the highest at 19.5 percent for the year ended February 2004.

United Kingdom: Circumcision Incidence

UK

Age Percent Circumcised Birth Year
16-44 15.8% 1956-1984
40-44 19.6% 1956-1960
16-19 11.7% 1981-1984

U.S. Circumcision Statistics

USA

Wirth reported that 76% of all boys in the survey were circumcised—whites, about 80% , and blacks about 45%. Wirth emphasized that, in some hospitals, more than 90 percent of boys were circumcised.1 Wirth's data are consistent with those reported by Laumann et al. below.