Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM
And you cannot prove the existence of a deity either. That's why religions are called "faith-based". That's where they creationist argument crumbles in a way in my eyes because creationists hold scientists to a higher standard than they hold their own faith. And, sadly, that is where the discussion ends.
|
The discussion ends when you realise that your faith in science should have far less faith than in anything else. It is erroenous views like this which lead to arrogance against faith in a creator.
Seriously, science? Something man made and finite that is constantly being updated and added to?
At the end of the day science only goes to "discover" what is already there. We use our own initiative to create new alloys and whatnot but that is all we can really do.. we will never create something from scratch.
They can find all the permutations and combinations of particular chemicals and elements, yet it already exists.
That itself gives more weight to a creator and everything to do with religion, than any theory that science could come up with.
As far as Evolution goes and the constant bleating of certain people about how antibiotics and such are proof of it.. go back to some of the threads where it is said that mutations are a specific process of bacteria and not anything else.