Quote:
Originally Posted by mousee09
I really think they need to do more research,but it really too soon to tell. By looking at this picture it really looks just like an ordinary well-preseved lemur skeleton. And if it is really the missing link, then my question is this..why have we not find more like this? surely by now...Scientists should have more evidence, right?
Not trying to say they have not been searching for something like this, but if it is really evidence it should not be this hard to find...the true would have been reveal by now.
|
I really don't understand your argument here. Are you dismissing the discovery because they didn't find it sooner?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mousee09
Another question would be if human do evolute...why are we not still evolving? Does evolution just stops???? Yes it might takes several years,but how long it that??? How long did it take for an animal to transform to a human?? It take steps in order to evolute, right? Why are there not people half human half something else now or show sign of evolving? Why do we continue to live shorter live spand even with the help of medicine and science?
|
You are asking a lot of questions here, but basically there is no need to evolve when you are at the top of the food chain. Several years? More like hundreds of thousands, millions, billions of years...numbers our brains can't fathom. And human life spans are getting longer, not shorter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mousee09
History of the World
It actually been proven already from dna that all human came from a single human female....that's been proven with dna...
Not trying to be critical of people who believe in evolution but just trying to understand why you believe in it. There are SEVERALS HOLES (alot of holes actually) in evolution that are very much unexplained that need to be explain if it wants to be proven. And please do not be upset by my comments...just trying to understand.
Like in the article "If a lie is told often enough it eventually becomes believable; it’s called propaganda"
|
You should hesitate when someone says something has been "proven" in science.
You website is nice, but always question what is the ulterior motive of the writer. The writer clearly is not writing in the interest of scientific exploration, but to promote a religious belief. In short, take what they say with a grain of salt. Here is a less biased look at
Mitochondrial Eve, and you will find it contradicts with your writer's point.
Good science will tell you evolution will never be 100% proven. Just as we weren't there during at the dawn of the Earth or the dawn of man, we will never be able to 100% prove how things happened. However, just like in criminal court cases, there is "beyond a reasonable doubt" and scientists will tell you that the evidence is on the side of evolution beyond a reasonable doubt. It's just in science that isn't enough to call it a fact.