[kirakira]

Since the other thread got closed, I thought we shall continue the discussion here. But please BE CIVILSED. No naming calling (you know who you are), just discuss the topic at hand.

Anyway I thought I'd chime into the debate, Ive seen a few people who supports military action against N. Korea. While I fully appreciate the good intentions because N. Korea government is pretty nasty, politics is not always black and white.

Well, as I said before, the last thing you want is to back Kim into a corner, in which case he has nothing to lose, and might as well go with a bang. Sure, N. Korea will be able to be "liberated", but at what cost.

I'm sure S. Korea nor Japan would not like to see radio fallout in Tokyo or Seoul, how would S. Korea and N. Korea integrate? Even if N. Korea's tests are all bluff, would you take the chance as a country to liberate ANOTHER country's citizen's life by putting 000,000s of lives of your own citizens at major risk?

In an ideal world, sure we could click on N. Korea and hit the delete button but the consequences in the real world is grave indeed.

IMHO, this is just a stalemate situation.

And to those who support military action, would you still support it if you were sent to ground zero? After all talk is cheap.