MMM,
It's no surprise that the Republican party is back biting and attacking each other. One of the very reasons why I considering going independent.
What do you think of Shannyn and her reporting? I wouldn't deny what she posts without first looking up the information and doing it myself. I would warn people she has and axe to grind against Sarah.
Shannyn Moore: Sarah Palin’s Not-So-Grand Inquisitor | Verum Serum
Interesting blog, but take what you want from it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsuwabuki
If you plan on having me understand what you are referring to, you really needed to quote. It's been days at least, if not a week, and I do have a daily life. I can't keep track of the conversation without quotes. I'd have to go back and construct one based on your ordering of sentences, which would take a lot of time I just don't want to spend on a forum.
I will say that your accusations of that I lack the ability to reason, argue, provide justification, or how I need to handle what constitutes evidence is just silly. Quite the opposite, I broke down your logic and showed where you had said something nonsensical. I'm a philosopher. We deal in arguments and counter arguments regularly. Now, if you're interested in continuing the discourse, I suggest you quote me, structure your responses to my quotes, so I can continue. Otherwise, I will guess you aren't serious, and I'll go back to having completely forgotten about this.
|
I'll start with the most alarming part that strikes me.
When did I accuse you of having no ability to reason, argue, or provide justification? Even then I would also throw that phrase "how I handle what constitutes evidence" in that lot.
That's a big swallow and I ask that you quote as what sentences, phrases, or paragraphs that lead you to believe I made those assumptions. I'm at a lost as to why, and would like to know how you came to those.
This whole "logic" answer doesn't satisfy. I addressed what you have said about the post, either you respond to what I have said or acknowledge what I have said has merit. This whole "I'm an philosopher" does not in no way constitute an answer to my arguments. In respect to this debate in what way does pointing that out merit you to have more credibility over me? I'll go an little bit further and ask why do yo keep pointing these "accomplishments" out, what do you gain to benefit?
I'm sorry, but in what why do you account for special treatment? I did that for EVERYONE that posted after me last time. I'm not going to keep double posting so that I can treat you above others. I really seriously doubt that you cannot tell which response is to what. Writing that I'm not "serious" is not an excuse to quite this debate, even then saying that so that I would account for your "special" requests. I'll ask this in what why do I treat yo above others, in the process break (minor) site rules continually in this thread? I'm not going to appease you.
"Daily life" is an incredibly poor excuse. Why you ask, well did you take time out to put in some response to what has been posted, yes you did. You can also put time in to respond to others. In essence don't expect others to treat your "time" above theirs. That said if you cannot keep track without quotes that is your problem not mine.
You spent time to post you surely can spend time to respond.