Quote:
Originally Posted by QueenNanami
I have no sympathy for Sarah Palin what so ever. You can not convince me other wise. It's hard for me to feel emotionally to someone I hate. Thats right i hate her now because im so sick of hearing about her. Im so sick of you tell me how great she is, i couldnt care less if she died. Of course if she died right as i typed this I may feel a tiny bit bad. You sure like that word contradiction now that i told you about it. Sarah Palin is neither my family or friend and i dont like her. So I dont care. Thats right Iam all full of venom and hate!
Well maybe it is! Maybe i did contradict myself when i said that, but there are some people i would stick up for and others i would not. If someone said Hilary Clinton wasnt smart enough I would say she was and I would stick up for that. But if i agree that Sarah Palin is stupid and is like the separated female twin to George W. Bush then No. I wouldnt stick up for her if i felt the same way. I would then be a Hypocrite. I dont care if that contradicts anything else Ive ever said because i dont really give anymore.
I would never stand up for Sarah Palin because I believe that she is a idiot and she makes woman look like a joke. That i stand firm on.
I doubt that if you are the Mayor of a certain town and people know that they are making rape victims pay for their testing kits. That there is no way you are going to hear about it. You're the freaking Mayor! Someone had probably told her about it. Whether she knew about it was UNCERTAIN! I said that in my post and it say's it in the article i posted up. I never said it was a true fact. What i meant by what i said is at first i didnt believe it like it was a made up story but it was a true story! There was really a problem with them charging their rape victims.
Yeah i did look it up on many websites. More then one and Ive even read the one you posted up to counter mine. They had to pass a freaking law to get them to stop charging people. It started while Sarah Palin was the Mayor and with the police chief she had selected. I have very high doubts that you wouldnt hear about that if you were mayor. I doubt that if it was going to make me look bad i would fess up to it. I believe she did know. Yes i did look into alot of sites and i thought others should know about her wrong doings.
This one i couldnt find alot of info on. So maybe you can. Prove it wrong  |
I'll start with the last paragraph. (one you quoted about aerial hunting)
That really helps when you don't provide an source.
Easy find. So next time post the full debate.
Alaska Wolf and Bear Protection Act (2008 - Ballotpedia)
What does uncertain mean? When you read the definition you would then know you can't make an accusation of wither she knew or not. THAT is the point. That said I don't care to compare "sites" this isn't an game or "I got more then you" is it? You cannot make an factual guess without evidence to support it.
Palin's town charged women for rape exams - CNN.com
Read it.
found something weird about Sarah Palin. At first i didnt think it was true but then I looked further into it and found it was.
Your words. Now think of how I'm supposed to take that? Saying something is true means I should take it as fact. Now if you meant to say the story had merit then point out the difference.
Hmmm,
I remember Elementary school when you say "I don't want to keep talking to you". That said I would like you to think about what you are saying. Do you honestly expect me to believe that you harbor such extensive feelings toward her? In the great phrases I would say.... Quite being childish. Then say you would only stick up for certain people, much simpler then making an generalized saying then negating it the second later.
If someone said Hilary Clinton wasnt smart enough I would say she was and I would stick up for that. But if i agree that Sarah Palin is stupid and is like the separated female twin to George W. Bush then No
Do you know the connecting between those two? I'll tell you this time. In what way do you see that one can have assumption and deny another theirs? Either
A you agree that both are branded along the same line.
B You deny both are branded along the same line.
Reason being you ask? Well first off that is an very broad generalizing, secondly saying unfounded things about someone does nothing. Thirdly that phrase is an mirror opposite of what your doing (if I was doing it to Clinton and you where defending her.)
You should care about your public perception.
Lastly I might add, since you made the comment that "I'm telling you how great she is", I'm defending her against such attacks. I have comments along the lines that I do like her, but I do believe that is as far as I gone (quote me if you think otherwise), as I do believe a LOT of the attacks against her is very unwanted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barone1551
Ok yes i say she is game... were just going back and forth on the subject. It is my belief that you can be an adult with out the legal status of being and adult. I use trial and criminal cases as example to show that people under the legal age to be an adult are seen as adults. This was just one example of why I think this. I just want to know what do you think makes an adult? Is there some magical being that changes you into an adult the second you turn 18? Are you telling me that you are more of an adult at 17 years and 364 days that you are at exactly 18. I wonder. Thats all I am trying to say. I dont think you need to be the age of 18 to be considered an adult. And I dont completly understand your point about being a physical threat. Do you mean to say that you can only be an adult if you 18 or if you kill people?
I really dont know what you are saying or trying to prove by the bolded part.
And you need to calm down a bit. I never used any excuses. I really didn't have time to find articles, and then post them. Then the topic kind of died down and I completely forgot about it. My bad, but you need to chill a little bit.
You can say that about any side. Every side has its extremists. I could go find things about the far right and post an identical post to yours.
|
Should such writings be taken then? No they should be ignored. That said what do you mean "I could post an identical post to yours"?
Barone1551,
Your writing, to which I responded is not an excuse. You never supported your argument that she "paraded" her children around.
the bold part was in response to your fourth paragraph. I'll enlighten you to what I meant by it. There is an connection between the three parts, that universally all agree are wrong. Now an person could believe murder was right, but does that make it right no. Once could believe that because someone is rich they should take part does that mean they can steal it no. One tales an lie, does that mean there honest, no. Apply this to what has been shown to the Palin's family. Second part stands as to what is happening now.
Who decides which children will be tried as adults? - By Harlan J. Protass - Slate Magazine
Children charged with murder… should they be tried as adults? | Lawinfo Weblog
Youths Shouldn't Be Tried As Adults, Study Says
Read them in response to children and crime.
Enough with the smart talk you know what I meant. when I said I was going by psychologically and legally what constitutes and adult. In what way did I say that someone comments murder they are an adult?
Tsuwabuki,
Second paragraph I'm going to begin with.
I "think" doesn't mean I do does it? That said offer evidence as to why when you get back.
To quote everyone would be the best possible scenario. AS I have said in context of the rules of this site I wasn't going to keep double posting, hence why I posted the way I did and gave the structure of the post.
What academic standards are you using? You do know the broad term "debate" stands for do you not? As I have said before don't make accusations without offering evidence. Even then I relate this to you, why do you continue prop you accomplishments up and then try to challenge me on "academic standards" in an internet debate?
IDEA :: International Debate Education Association
Is this what you refer to?
How can you then exist on an rules that have not taken place at the beginning of this thread? It's like putting things in an middle of an game. To add I don't know what debate format you are talking about, and we have no judge so there are really no set standards in this type of discussion (how can there be, it's not regulated). Question then points towards me and why I adamantly ask people to provide evidence to support there argument. Simple, claims and accusations remain false until it's given merit by support.
That said, I put no stock into what "you think" without you offering evidence as to why. I also would say your being above yourself with the "philosopher". If I haven't made it clear yet I will now; you don't bring personal accomplishments into an debate. When two come together the only thing that matters is argument and evidence that supports that point. NOTHING ELSE. So in retrospect your only serving yourself when you keep bring up what you "are".
Can't really respond to the first paragraph, other then have an good time.
(I ran out of text space so I had to cut out out two quotes, sorry)