Quote:
Originally Posted by solemnclockwork
Should such writings be taken then? No they should be ignored. That said what do you mean "I could post an identical post to yours"?
Barone1551,
Your writing, to which I responded is not an excuse. You never supported your argument that she "paraded" her children around.
the bold part was in response to your fourth paragraph. I'll enlighten you to what I meant by it. There is an connection between the three parts, that universally all agree are wrong. Now an person could believe murder was right, but does that make it right no. Once could believe that because someone is rich they should take part does that mean they can steal it no. One tales an lie, does that mean there honest, no. Apply this to what has been shown to the Palin's family. Second part stands as to what is happening now.
Who decides which children will be tried as adults? - By Harlan J. Protass - Slate Magazine
Children charged with murder… should they be tried as adults? | Lawinfo Weblog
Youths Shouldn't Be Tried As Adults, Study Says
Read them in response to children and crime.
Enough with the smart talk you know what I meant. when I said I was going by psychologically and legally what constitutes and adult. In what way did I say that someone comments murder they are an adult?
|
I didnt use it as an excuse by any means. I didnt have time so I figured if you did, you could just type into google what I provided. Not to time consuming I thought.
palin's family used political gain - Google Search
Here now I know you don't seem to value others opinions very much. It seems you need some one to write an article about a topic before you form an opinion. This isnt meant to be mean or hurtful. It just seems that way. Everyone here has an opinion, why does it need to be based off someone else s opinion. I personally take in to account my personal beliefs from what I have seen, and what I have read other places. Both my side and your side are based on opinions, nothing is fact on either side, no matter how many fox news articles you post. Its all opinions, my opinion, your opinion, others opinion, the authors opinion. I base mine off of all these factors. I based my opinion that she used her family after numerous hours of watching election coverage and reading things from other people, and watching news shows that covered the events.
Now to the being and adult thing. I thank you for finding articles the coincide with what I was saying. The articles show my point just as well as it does your. It specifically states that maturity is brought into account and that they can be seen as an adult below the age of 18. If they willingly knew what they were doing they could be seen as an adult. Thats why I said you can be and adult with out being the age of 18. You can know exactly what your doing, and act as a responsible person. This was my point. The articles back that up too. You didn't specifically say murder, but when I brought up the point that people under the age of 18 can be tried as adults, you said that its only becuase they were a harm to society.
And actually this is partly my fault, I didn't realize that Bristol was already 18. I guess I didn't realize becuase I had been thinking of her when she was covered in the election stuff. And I was thinking of when she got pregnant. I didn't know she was 18 already. So this kind of makes the stuff about being a child moot becuase she is an adult.... in pretty much all ways now.