Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyororin
The discussion of this sort of thing always interests me, because it`s something I have a feeling I`ll have to deal with in the future. My son - while genetically male - was exposed to virtually no male hormones during gestation and didn`t develop male sexual organs. His body is not producing male hormones to a level anywhere close to normal. We have been told that there is a pretty fair chance that he will not be a "boy" - and already he`s literally worlds away in behavior. What that means in the long run, well, we won`t know until we get there. But if he is certain he is a girl for pretty much his whole life, I would have no qualms about letting him have a sex change at 16.
|
I'm confused. How can he be genetically male, with no male organs?
I just wish to understand.
As for the topic of this thread. I think 16 is too young, biologically, as typically the body isn't done developing yet.