|
Great, just my luck.
|
|
Posts: 1,577
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London
|
|
07-23-2009, 11:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by solemnclockwork
So my sister should have aborted her baby because she couldn't give him the ideal life?
Should someone who is middle class abort there child, because they cannot give it a upper class life?
Do you know how elitist this sounds? May I ask you, in what optimal condition do you think babies should be born it? Getting the ideal situation does not happen, and by this logic one life (like the phrased used before we are talking about a life, a human life understand what that implies) where they couldn't get the best should have been better dead?
|
Splendid. Someone who puts words in my mouth! How kind of you!
Where in any of my statements, did I say you had to be upper class? Hm? Pleas,e find it for me, and I'll accept your point.
Until that point, your post is invalid.
The "ideal" environment for a baby to be born, is to a mother who is old enough to understand a babies needs. To a mother who is not a child herself still. To a mother who has atleast finished high school. If that sounds upper class to you, then I don't know what to say.
Note: Lets not make this a religious thread.
EDIT: Sorry, allow me to elaborate why I think such surroundings isn't healthy for a child. Such environments are prone to chaos. A lot of stress is abound in them, and problems arise. Some can turn into violent acts. Research shows that babies that grow up in violent or chaoti surroundings, usually become a danger to the society (my words ofcourse.) in the long run.
So, now if you can't give a baby an ideal environment, you're not just endangering the babys life, but many other people that the baby (in his later life) might end up harming.
- “I've been lucky. I'll be lucky again.” -
Last edited by Salvanas : 07-23-2009 at 11:16 AM.
|