Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM
Again, you couldn't be more wrong. It is "intellectual property". That means stealing includes not only the disc and the case and the packaging, but stealing includes the intellectual property. The data on the disc.
|
Please don't base it on the DMCA redefinition of stealing. I think it's you who have it all wrong. You are making all these "legal" organizations RIGHT BY DEFAULT and not judging them.
Quote:
|
Stealing is stealing, whether or not it is a physical disc, book, DVD or it is data.
|
Stealing is stealing, what I've been saying till now, not something you can use for something it isn't.
Quote:
|
Your logic that it is "reproduced" making it not stealing is even more backwards because now you are distributing stolen data. That is worse than just stealing one physical disc, as you are costing the creator even MORE potential sales.
|
On the contrary, piracy has helped the popularity of products. If there were no piracy, it would have cost them quite more. you fail at realizing it.
Quote:
|
I am not going to keep going like this with you iPhantom. You are hung up on the word "stealing" and it is a word I will not stop using to make you feel more comfortable. It is stealing. There is no way around that. Either you come to accept that or continue to justify illegal activities in your head while the industry and ultimately the fans suffer in the end.
|
As always you get out of the discussion claiming as you're right. You're freaking wrong. I have discussed more than just the word stealing, I brought up valid points like the pathetic copyright of Nintendo, RIAA and MPAA using illegal ways to kill piracy... you just can't see it. It's in your eyes.
Being a 'legality' defendant doesn't make you good, it makes you blind and unable to see the truth.
And your claims that piracy only damages are without no point. Do some research. A lot of products wouldn't be known at all.