Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin4hire
I certainly take it's founding principles seriously. Do you have a problem with the concept of national self determination? Stop dodging the issue and either acknowledge or address this issue.
|
Tibet is called "Tibetan
Autonomous Region".
Quote:
|
Whatever his political shortcomings may be. His broader goal is noble.
|
With illegal funding from CIA, eh?
Quote:
|
Huh? That wasn't even a coherent response to what you quoted.
|
Do you want to insult somebody?
Quote:
|
I read your article. Did you?
|
Oh, yes. And I agree with the CCP's respond towards Dalai Lama in that article.
Quote:
|
So the part of my post you quoted is proved right by your own article. Frankly however I'm in favour of Tibetan radicalism.
|
Radicalism wouldn't solve anything.
Quote:
How does that disprove what I said?
I'll repeat what I said...
Noone is disputing China is multiethnic
However it is multiethnic whether these ethnic groups like it or not that is the problem
i.e. 2 ethnic groups wanting independence from China is 2 ethnic groups too many.
|
It matters because all of the 56 groups are all under the same and coherent minority policies from Beijing.