View Single Post
(#113 (permalink))
Old
clintjm's Avatar
clintjm (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 402
Join Date: Aug 2009
10-11-2009, 07:37 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post
Sorry, I couldn't resist.

Who are "the wrong people?"
America's Enemies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post

I don't understand these catch phrases. Can you please explain?
Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi... you know... Gaddafi... 400k "Obama to disburse $2.5 million in economic aid to Libya, including $400,000 for Qaddafi's foundations. Of the $400,000 half will go to a foundation run by the leader's son, Saif, and the other half to one run by his daughter, Aisha."

A growing weakness on the international stage. Not since Carter has there ever been such a display to the world. This enboldens America's enemies.
Would you like me to list these demonstrations, or do you deny that any exists.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post

Either Obama has done nothing, or he has done "socialist acts". So yes, you really need to list them. So far I have heard that Obama has done nothing, so I would really like to hear about the "socialist acts" he has actually accomplished.
I'm not sure I follow you. Accomplishments do not equal socialistic acts.
Well.... that is... last time I checked the constitution.

* The happy go-lucky Swedish have been quoted saying even they wouldn't be prepared to bail out and own car factories.

* That little nationalized health care plan be proposed that has been proven to be unsustainable we can't afford

* Wealth distribution .... demonstrated best by cash for clunkers.

* The president has admitted that he doesn't believe in trickle down economics.

* Government dependency programs growing

* Call for more government regulation

* Government spending was 37% of GDP in 2008... I fear what new highs this year will reach.

* Bailouts: They are privatizing gains and socializing losses.

* Don't get me started on what is being taught in public schools.


and the list goes on...
More?


Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post

Spending 2 million dollars to try and land the Olympics is probably conservative compared to how much Japan and Brazil spent...but what is the problem? Please explain why advocating for the Olympics to be held in America is a bad thing.
The olympics *rarely* turn a profit... they do the opposite. Especially in corrupt city such as Chicago..
Especially in the situation the US is in for many years to come.
It was an excuse for the fed government to write itself a check, and have future adminsitration blame past administrations when it fails while they line their pockets.
Chicago has got its issues aline...



Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post
Let's hear your better speech. I assume you have graduated high school. Where did Obama and his wife mess up?
I take it then you didn't read it because you wouldn't need to ask would you.

Here you go..

The preview:

Link 1:

Michelle Obama: It's a 'sacrifice' to travel to Europe to pitch for the Olympics. But I'm doing it for the kids. | Washington Examiner

Link 2:

President Obama, Michelle Obama's 2016 Olympics Speeches: Full Transcript

Why would the OLC give a hoot about their kids or michelle sitting on her Dad's lap when she was 20.

"Not just as a mother raising two beautiful young women to embrace athleticism and pursue their full potential. I'm also asking as a daughter. See, my dad would have been so proud to witness these Games in Chicago. And I know they would have meant something much more to him, too. You see, in my dad's early thirties, he was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis. And as he got sicker, it became harder for him to walk, "...
The fail boat has docked already...

The president basically was also just ... "its not about me" but yeah... it really is...
Walk with him on a journey to the olympics in Chicagoo... blah blah..
Read it and ask me again with a straight face.
[/quote]

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post

FOX "News" is a conservative spout. They aren't even shy about it. Pardon my direct statement, but only morons consider FOX "News" to be fair and bipartisan. This is standard operations. People that quote FOX "News" are in a different category from people that get their news from more reliable sources. Don't get me wrong, FOX "News" is incredibly entertaining.
Basically your statement of Fox news in itself isn't fair or bipartisan. There are conservative independents and democrats you know...

Say what you will ... they are the media that are changing other major media sources. ABC and CNN refused to cover Acorn corruption and Van Jones until they couldn't play it down any more. The white house is tied to CNN/ABC/CBS so tightly that heads roll when anything really negative against the administration is uncovered and put out by these media giants. Its changing though for the better; which is wonderful ... recent Detroit and Chicago are examples of this....


Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM View Post

Again, I don't know what you are really saying. The majority of government officials do not live like "rock stars" but I would love to hear more about that.
Government officials only treat themselves to the best at the expense of tax payers is what I was trying to get across. They are the true definition of elitism.


here is a stat top of the google lookup....
Government salaries vs. private sector salaries - CNN.com

Most of them can't even be bothered to read bills they pass.
Look at the amount of vacation and pay...

You say "do not"... back it up my friend.
Reply With Quote