Quote:
Originally Posted by DougLewis
When I read this, my understanding of the point is:
It is a complaint about students being difficult to organize into "influence groups."
Several possible reasons are given.
- They flow through the system quickly - preventing a core group from bonding into an association with possible political influencial powers.
|
Sorry, I don’t understand “They flow through the system quickly” and “a core group”
Quote:
- They lack understanding of the powers that can be achieved using political group "single voice."
|
What’s “single voice”?
Quote:
- Because they are isolated and not organized - they are disconnected from a main body.
|
Sorry! But what’s a main body?
Quote:
- The perception of them by others is they are sullen and angry individuals.
|
I understand this! And I agree with you!!
Quote:
- They are focused entirely upon their own personal interests, (not interested in forming a collective).
|
You mean they are not interested in uniting, don’t you?
Quote:
The silly post.
An introduction of mirth into study can make the exercise more interesting.
Some one had a question about "luck."
Creatively, I thought, I offered several lines or "ditty" which illustrated many uses of the word "luck" as it would be used in normal conversation. Sometimes this can assist in a person "getting it" more easily.
It seems my good intention may not have been.
I apologize if I offended anyone.
|
I don’t understand what you mean enough, but I think you mean your post about “luck”, and I haven’t answered it.
I’m so sorry. I read it, but I didn’t know what I should have written because many people had answered it and I didn’t want to answer them with the same sentences. I don’t have variations of expressions.
I think that’s why snbzk suggested me to edit my first post.
I’m sorry.