Quote:
Originally Posted by xyzone
What you said isn't a "scientific approach" in itself, either.
|
How the hell can what I say be "scientific approach" when I didn't argue about anything scientific?
I'm not gonna apply the scientific method for anything other than Science when I talk on here! The whole point of a forum is opinions, not scientific method!
My point was this; you believe that Evolution and Global warming could be labelled as scientific laws tomorrow and you wouldn't have anything against it. The reason you believe this is because you assume and blindly believe that any arguments against Evolution, are from creationists, and any arguments against Global Warming are Al Gore propaganda conspiracy theorists... in short, you believe that anyone arguing against either of these are "pseudo-scientists".
The simple fact is though, anyone that talks about evolution as though it was fact, simply doesn't know the science behind it. And anyone talking about Global Warming with 100% certainty that it's man-made, simply doesn't even bother to listen to the facts and doesn't even question the history of this planet... so basically, these people are as close minded as those "religious nuts" that these people seem to argue with and make fun of all the time!