Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM
I find it interesting this notion that man not only doesn't affect climate change, but couldn't if they wanted to.
Like I said, fly into LAX on a clear day and look out the window as your plane descends into LA and tell me man has no effect on his environment.
|
I'm not suggesting we don't effect the environment negatively... I'm all for environmental change, after all I'm the one championing hemp as a biofuel, remember?
But how can we trust data when
the media and the scientists involved have a great deal of money tied up in global warming being MAN-made...
Look at all the money involved in the advertising associated with man-made global change, look at all the high budget movies associated with the end of the world!
Isn't it curious that General Electric owns NBC, which is constantly propagating us with "Go Green" advertising? It's not to make the world a better place, it's to disguise us from the real puppeteering at hand.
There's no realistic and sound scientific data that proves man is causing global warming; but they have
plenty of reasons to let us believe that's the case. That's not to say we shouldn't research biofuels, the overuse of plastics, and automobile emissions; but as of now there's no proof we're causing the end of the world, and no sense in causing a damn international pandemic.
The 0.7C increase in the average global temperature over the last hundred years is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term, natural climate trends.
Global temperatures have not risen in any statistically-significant sense for 15 years and have actually been falling for nine years. The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed a scientific team had expressed dismay at the fact global warming was contrary to their predictions and admitted their inability to explain it was “a travesty”.
CLIMATE CHANGE IS NATURAL: 100 REASONS WHY