View Single Post
(#16 (permalink))
Old
KyleGoetz's Avatar
KyleGoetz (Offline)
Attorney at Flaw
 
Posts: 2,965
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
03-10-2010, 01:09 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickOShay View Post
Yeah, I agree. In my first Japanese text book way back when.. it never taught us those terms.. the verbs were simply referred to as るverbs and うverbs. So every time I tried to explain to Japanese people that I had no idea how to conjugate verbs ending in dictionary form る that I was unfamiliar with, they could never understand what I meant. I had to draw it out for them.

BTW.. is there anyway you have heard of to tell which they are for the ones that end in dictionary form る other than through experience?
You've got the guideline really wrong.

Every verb that does not end in /eru/ or /iru/ is definitely a godan verb. Most that end in /eru/ or /iru/ are ichidan verbs. It's not /ru/ verbs, but /eru/ and /iru/ verbs.

For example, 止まる is a godan verb even though it ends in る. On the other hand, 止める is an ichidan verb because it ends in /eru/, and in general, verbs that end in /eru/ are ichidan.

There are exceptions, such as 帰る, which ends in /eru/ but is a godan.

In general, here's what you should be thinking, provided it's not instinctive at this point:
1. Do I know whether this verb is ichidan or godan already? If so, stop. If not, continue to #2.
2. Does it end in /eru/ or /iru/? If no, it is godan. If yes, it's probably ichidan.

Here's a good example of why you have to just memorize some of them:
いる (to exist)->います
いる (to need)->いります

One other thing to note: It's entirely possible natives don't know these terms ichidan and godan. I wouldn't be surprised if Sashimister wasn't aware of this distinction. Since Japanese people don't have to learn the rule, they don't need the terms. It's more of a linguistics thing.

It's like how native English speakers don't (in general) learn certain terms for English (past pluperfect, e.g.), but can just use the rules without being taught them.

Last edited by KyleGoetz : 03-10-2010 at 01:12 AM.
Reply With Quote