[Koir]

*seconds the idea that new rules would be created*

Anarchy really isn't a society. So the absence of rules is a temporary situation at best. Also, I would wonder why the removal of established rules and processes was thought a good idea in the first place. Perhaps those who say there are no rules are using them as a means to institute new rules they themselves have crafted to better fit the current situations they see. With them in the unassailable position of power.

Lack of rules does not mean the absence of rules.

*also seconds the sentiment that this entire thread is source material for a school project, with the possible side purpose of a bored forumgoer wishing to use the forum to amuse themselves*