Quote:
Originally Posted by murasaki11
Instead of bashing the website maybe we should help point out the errors to them.
|
I'm not bashing them. I'm telling noobs not to use the site. There's a difference. Your suggestion would essentially be to encourage people to use a site that is known to have shoddy pedagogical standards.
Quote:
Building a website is hard and I must say that website has the most information I've seen. They are trying.
|
I don't want a teacher who tries. I want a teacher who teaches me correct information.
Quote:
Why bash them when we can help them.
|
Because I don't want to help a site that is trying to teach Japanese and doing a poor job. I want to tell people to avoid it.
Quote:
Its not like its a horrible website.
|
Wrong.
Quote:
Those errors were just little mistakes.
|
A lot of little mistakes add up to a big mistake.
Or, you know, completely misspelling "chiitaa" as "cheeta," e.g.
Quote:
The site didn't seem to follow the "oo change to "ou" rule. Which in romaji, there isn't really rules because its romaji.
|
Which is precisely another reason the site is crap.
Quote:
Their website does say that a lot of it is under construction.
|
Good for them. Do you want to learn from a textbook that is still being edited?
Quote:
The person who made the website must know a lot about Japanese because a lot of information is there.
|
Not true.
Quote:
Spelling mistakes indicate that they just typed it wrong.
|
Not when a large percentage of words have spelling mistakes. It indicates the person making the site does not speak Japanese to any degree necessary to teach it.