View Single Post
(#106 (permalink))
Old
clintjm's Avatar
clintjm (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 402
Join Date: Aug 2009
05-04-2010, 09:34 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbradfor View Post
As an aside, one potential effect of this, and I know they had this in mind when drafting the law, is that it to some extent "forces" other states to change their laws as well.

From the first part: Text of Arizona's Anti-Illegal Immigration Law - Part 1 | KEYTLaw, section B

"4. If the entity requires proof of legal presence in the United States before issuance, any valid United States federal, state or local government issued identification. "

AFAIK, MN, the state in which I live, does not require proof of legal presence to get a driver's license, and I know many other states, such as CA does not as well.This means that if I go to AZ, I need to bring my passport.
That's a bit weird / scary.Now one may argue that this is because MN (and CA) has it wrong, and AZ is doing things correctly. But it is, to me, an interesting side effect.
It also says on point #4 for say any US state or local government issued ID.
That would include your MN DL or ID in Arizona.
Reply With Quote