Quote:
Originally Posted by jbradfor
NO, you are wrong. Read it again, I even put it in bold for you, yet you "somehow" missed it. Point 4 starts "If the entity requires proof of legal presence in the United States before issuance". That is exactly my point, MN (and CA) does not require proof of legal presence in the US, hence does not meet their criteria. I don't see any other way of reading this statue.
|
"If the entity requires proof of legal presence in the United States before issuance, any valid United States federal, state or local government issued identification. "
It clearly states in that sentence that if you don't have any of items 1-3, AZ state issued ID, <now the part you bolded:> or before the AZ state ID is issued, you should have any *state* or federal issued ID, which includes your state non-vehicle ID, or DL. Everyone in the US should have this in any state.
I'm not sure what picture you are painting here. You are in Arizona out of state and you don't have any state or government issued ID on you? Yeah, I guess you would have to have a passport or green card if that is all you got. No one travels out of state without simple ID. What is your point?