Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonTakeshi
So, you assume that we should believe in what science tells us?
It might be your senses that form the "reality" that you're "in". Every thought you make might be a concept. Concepts, that might be created by you. Damn, even "creation" itself might be a concept! And even a concept might be a concept!
Try to think about something that you have not seen; Try to think about something that you have not heard.
Try to create a concept without any of your senses - You can't.
So, what's the use of the brain without senses? What's the use of a computer if it has no data to process?
And so if your brain doesn't have anything to process, do you exist? How can you affirm your existence? By someone else's "senses"?
I am an Agnostic, conceptually speaking.
"Agnosticism is the view that the truth value of certain claims—especially claims about the existence or non-existence of any deity, but also other religious and metaphysical claims—is unknown or unknowable. (...) . In some senses, agnosticism is a stance about the similarities or differences between belief and knowledge, rather than about any specific claim or belief."
|
It's difficult to understand what you are trying to say. Are you saying that you don't believe in science at all? You have never mixed certain chemicals in like a chemistry class with your classmates and achieved the same results? You have never worked out a mathmatical formula or worked out any kind of scientific experiments?
You say we cannot create a concept without our senses? What about thought, imagination, and critical thinking. These don't require taste, sight, touch, smell, or hearing.
Also, im not understanding the diagram. Why would the senses be separate from the brain leading to human reality?
Last, I'm not understanding this term "human reality." Reality is what it is. Our senses and thought process allows us to navigate, learn, and understand reality. I think rather than use this word reality, I think we should just say the world we live in.