Quote:
Originally Posted by steven
I appreciate it. That's what I was looking for. Unfortunately it wasn't what I was looking for. I didn't get a lot out of that but hearsay like pieces of evidence. I also found out how big a NK torpedo is. That's great... but although the document clearly states "There is no other plausible explination", other than that "the torpedo was fired by a North Korean submarine", the document doesn't do a very good job of proving that or even supporting it with any actual evidence or data.
25 experts from 10 top Korean expert agencies, 22 military experts, 3 experts recommended by the National Assembly, and 24 foreign experts consisting of four support teams from the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the Kingdom of Sweden. I'm sure there are some remarkable people in there... but what a vague description.
And no I don't go around reading these kinds of things all the time. Are all these kinds of documents like this?
|
What exactly were you looking for? The report gives its findings and its conclusions in fairly simple terms. It wasn't vague at all. In fact I think it was very clear who they blamed and why. I mean if it wasnt NK who was it? Now if you are a conspiracy theorist like komitsuki, then the report is not going to give you the answers because that is what they are disputing (I dont dismiss his theory altogether, though I dont really buy it. I mean if it was a false flag attack, Im still waiting for the follow up
)