Quote:
Originally Posted by steven
I see what you're saying. While I have nothing against the Australians, Swedes, South Koreans, or Americans I still think there is a chance that they could be lying about this. I mean, who appoints these people and exactly how qualified are they? That's not to say I know anything about torpedos or anything! So I guess if the torpedo is the main piece of evidence, I think it'd be worthwhile to take a look at some pictures and stuff like that. After a quick google search, this is what I came up with:
BBC News - S Korea freezes trade with North over warship sinking
"They reported that parts of the torpedo retrieved from the sea floor had lettering that matched a North Korean design."
So there is a "No. 1" marking written in blue sharpie. That's the only piece of "hard" evidence I've come across. |
good point. here are two articles you may find interesting. they are two american scientists think the north korean torpedo evidence cannot be a firm evidence.
US Professors Raise Doubts About Report on South Korean Ship Sinking | Asia | English
South Korea ship sinking: Doubts surface about North Korea's role - latimes.com
do not worry about interesting in conspiracy steven. wikileak is popularizing conspiracy thinking on politics and international relations in public. i cannot complain a legitimate website like this exists.