[Jaydelart]

Whatever the case, I dislike otakus primarily for this reason: they're usually selfish and (obviously) obssessive. The same with many fanatical, "hardcore" fans here in America. It's important to note the majority of these particular kinds of fans are younger -- or young-minded/immature.

I do think it's a shame that some agencies are bending over for these kinds of audiences, but I also can't blame them for their concern. Idols, in my opinion, aren't just individual musicians grouped together - especially in Japan - because although it may seem like it, they don't represent themselves like most solo-artists do... or, at least not to the same degree; they may have less freedom; they are more often commited to representing a message.

It may sound weird, but the way I see it, the nature of the concept of idols dictates they become a kind of "guardian" for their listeners -- a form of cheerleader (possibly explaining the number of members in any given group). Which is still definitely a respectable aspect of music.
... But when you find out your "guardian" has priorities other than cheering for you and motivating you, specifically having a romantic relationship with someone... you may get (subconsciously) offended. Taken into consideration that many otakus are immature, incapable of handling a number of realities, and that idols attract a lot of fans, which include many otaku... naturally that would mean many of their fans would be upset to find out their idols are engaging in romantic affairs. It's potentially a loss of profit (or the gain of "anti-fans" -- as sad as those are).

This is just all my opinion. Idols are intriguing because, to me, they are an example of the complexity of life and society. It's a trade-off; a tragedy invoked by human ambition. Their life seems as though it comes with some amazing rewards and some monstrous punishments. And, in this case, being prohibited of an intimate relationship is one of the "punishments" to be suffered.