sort blowing smoke dude -
09-11-2010, 12:15 AM
get real dude, a DF-21 capablities are nothing revolutionary beyond what todays supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles already have.
The End of the Aircraft Carrier?
Or just one more threat to counter?
BY Stuart Koehl
August 12, 2010
The reason is, the missile is only one part of an extended reconnaissance strike complex, consisting of sensor platforms, communications links, command nodes, and launch systems. The ocean is big, and the carrier is small. I was once on a COD flight that could not find the carrier, even though it knew precisely where the carrier was, because our navigation system was just a little bit out of alignment, and the carrier was operating in EMCON. Now imagine how hard it is to find a CVBG that does not want to be found.
In any case, if the DF-21 becomes a real threat, the U.S. most likely would move towards "pre-launch intercept" (i.e., destroying the missiles on the ground, before they are launched). Though the use of mobile launchers increases the difficulty of targeting them, the advent of persistent surveillance systems--whether space-based or aerial--will eventually allow us to locate, identify, and destroy these missiles on the ground using a combination of cruise missiles, UAVs, and stealth aircraft equipped with tactical standoff missiles.
At the end of the day, the large platform or system with broad-based operational capabilities has the inherent resilience and robustness to defeat a technically clever but operationally narrow threat.
Stuart Koehl is a frequent contributor to THE WEEKLY STANDARD Online.
Last edited by fluffy0000 : 09-11-2010 at 12:16 AM.
Reason: smoke
|