View Single Post
(#56 (permalink))
Old
Sinestra's Avatar
Sinestra (Offline)
ショ ン
 
Posts: 612
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Where ever Miyuki Sawashiro is
Send a message via AIM to Sinestra Send a message via Yahoo to Sinestra
09-11-2010, 05:13 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin4hire View Post
I think that is a bit of wishful thinking on your part.

It is true that we dont know what the American R&D is working on. It isnt true that Americas military might is incalculable at this moment.

Also this news was released last month. Im not sure how you think the missile already has a countermeasure.

Talk from analysts say the pentagon currently has nothing it can answer it.

The reason this missile is called the carrier buster is because it can evade the air defenses of an entire battlegroup and can hit a carrier on the move.
Ronin your smarter than that. Do you really think the Navy never thought that one day a military would try to develop a missile to sink a US carrier? The counter measures that in place were already touched on by Fluffy. I am willing to bet 10 years of salary that this missile can not bypass an entire carrier group without being pinged, jammed and or fired at. The Carriers alone are fitted with anti missile system sophisticated enough to shoot them out of the air not to mentioned land based interceptors.

If i was going to sink a carrier my first choice would be by submarine as Fluffy stated. But we are seriously off topic so i am going to stop there i suggest we get back on topic before the thread is shut down.


Reply With Quote