Quote:
Originally Posted by GoNative
No, what I said is that there should be consequences for being the aggressors in what was the biggest loss of human life from war in the history of mankind.
Start a world war that kills 10's of millions of people and you lose, there should be consequences. You don't have to agree with me but that's the way I think. And I believe that one of the consequences should be that you lose the right to ever again develop a military force capable of waging a similar worldwide conflict. Germany waged 2 world wars last century. I certainly wouldn't trust them again with a massive military!
|
That there are consequences for losers in war is just a fact of human history so I dont disagree with that. (I dont know what your point is then if that is all you were saying. I mean I thought you were implying that you believed in US oversight of Japan's military.)
I disagree that WW2 is in any way relevant to whether or not Japan or Germany should be "allowed" to have a military and that it was "the biggest loss of human life from a way in history" means nothing.
As it turns out... should Japan and Germany choose to increase their commitments to their militaries then there is really nothing we can do to stop them so you and Marzikeen had invalid points right from the beginning and I was only really attacking the self-righteous way in which those points were being made.