Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsbody70
UM I 'll talk about this later-- but considering the kind of life that many celebrities lead-- FAME MEDIA etc are the children protected?
I know many adoptees plus mothers who had their babies removed and it is not simple at all.
to say there is no such thing as ones own natural history-- is nonsense.
even adoptees in their own countries DO have many problems about their roots and their back grounds. None of it is Black or WHite I assure you.
Our roots are very important indeed.
One can be blase about this -- but it is not straightforward as you seem to think.
|
I don't see many problem with celebrities and adoption. What you say is almost like you think celebrities shouldn't have children at all, that doesn't sound right.
But if you say these children are used to make someone more popular, and they are sort of trained and put in a pose they cannot possibly enjoy, than I must agree, this would be considered as a dreadful act, as no human being should be used as a mere tool of any but more importantly not for some shallow reason (like getting more famous-popular...).
I think there certainly is 'natural history'(though this expression does not really describe my thoughts). A person has nature, temper, characteristics and even talent, which all can be inherited.
And arguing about if it existed or not would be almost like arguing about if reincarnation exists or not, which really would lead nowhere, only in this case there are some proofs that nature does indeed(scientifically proven) shapes who we are, what are the perspectives of us and what possibilities we have etc... Anyone says otherwise have never met peoples who born with mongolism or autism etc. These are quite extreme examples so I give another one much less extreme - art-talent is something can(not necessarily) be inherited, translation: someone with talented ancestors for example musicians can inherit this talent (according to American researches and personal experiences) so if she was adopted and had never met her parents or anyone who she is blood-related to, and shows talent in music is not rare and not coincidental.
Well what I think about other factors of a person natural history would be certainly more arguable, so I think not sharing is the best...
For the OP:
Anyways I also dislike talking about my personal history, but if something to be said that wasn't before, I'd say my personal goal would be that I could over-leap the results of the environment and my nature, although I had beautiful childhood, have good education, wonderful family... Whoever pleased with itself hardly evolves.
And I don't believe in forcing people to do something. If someone is to really change, it must come from inside of a person not from the society or environment. All we can do that we shaw a possible way, what we genuinely think/believe is the best by acting so. I mean if there are problems caused slowly by society or environment, the only way to solve it is to slowly change it back bit by bit, and what can an ordinary person do?...