Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryzorian
When they kicked the UN inspectors out, that gave the US full authorization to invade.
|
No, they did not give anything to the US administration.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryzorian
They had barrels of strictnine, enough to kill everyone in the state of NewYork, plus various older WMD types like mustard gas.
|
Strictnine? So what? Iraq had neither missiles nor heavy bombers to deliver a suitable amount of strictnine to American soil.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryzorian
Perhaps a stable Iraq was the real threat to American interests and the destablization was done to inhance our influence in the region.
|
Creation of dozen thousands of America-haters after the destabilization meets your interest in the region, eh? No problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryzorian
If you doubt the US, the only country to actually use nukes on someone else. Isn't capable, or willing to reduce an enemy country to a smokeing ruin, why make claims of them being all big and bad, if you yourself doubt they really are?
|
First of all, you dropped A-bomb on Japan having a monopoly on nuclear weaponry.
Nowadays, if you attack Iraq or Afganistan by combat nuclear devices , Russia, China and India will be involved due to radioactive poisoning of their territories. You will not hold the retaliation strikes.