Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM
In America, that is rape.
|
Here also, and believe me if he is guilty he deserves what he gets and more...but the more i read the more i suspect.
I will not lynch a man on hearsay no matter how much some dont like him.
heres a paragrapgh from the internet
As Swedish prosecutors' sex-crime allegations against Julian Assange play out, one aspect of the case merits serious scrutiny. We know Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, by name. But his two accusers are consistently identified only as "Miss A" and "Miss W" in the media, and their images are blurred. In the UK it is against the law to name an accuser in a sex-crime case once a complaint has been made; elsewhere – in the US, and much of Europe – media convention demands that accusers get the same protection. This is bad law and bad policy. Motivated by good intentions, the outcome harms women.
to be fair here is the page
Julian Assange's sex-crime accusers deserve to be named - Our Need to Awaken...
IM looking at the fact that usually people even those that are accused are also protected! strange he was not.