Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM
On a separate thread I said the following:
"If our ally is being attacked then it is not only our duty but a requirement to help them. If that help is in the form of military defense and is what is needed, then that is what happens."
It was suggested that this is quite an offensive position. However, to me, it seems like normal diplomacy and how countries relate to each other.
Is this a mistaken notion?
|
Not necessarily by means of arms... you can try to help your ally disolve the problem by using diplomacy. Say if you were in a governmental position and don't agree with your ally country's actions, would you still hold this position? But yeah, I don't think it's offensive though, it's the internet.