Quote:
Originally Posted by Koir
It's "your", "kid".
You certainly live up to your sig. As a bonus, I put it to you that if the amendment was such a universally welcomed thing, why would a group of anime & manga publishers who incidentally *don't* make "child pornography" publicly state they wouldn't attend the TAF? Perception of reduced sales in a certain area, perhaps?
|
You would pick out a single grammar mistake and harp on that. But yeah, I guess I do live up to my signature, hence why it's there. First, no one ever said it had to be universally liked. You're an example of someone who opposes it, although you obviously don't hold any weight compared to publishers, but it can still be taken that the amendment won't be liked by everyone.
I can actually think of several reasons why, but before I walk into a loaded question, I ask you to provide the reasoning for why these publishers left yourself, because "a group of publishers" doesn't have any merit. Who has stated that they're leaving, and what is the reasoning behind leaving?
Is it because they don't support the amendment itself, or because they're afraid of brand association? That's the key.