Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin4hire
Japan doesn't need money. It's the 3rd richest country in the world and in a world with so many issues, people and places are almost competing for our attention. I mean you can't donate to everything. So why not prioritise?
I'm not giving them a cent.
I've already made it clear that if we can offer our help in another way then fine. But not my money.
As for macro economics. I know what it is morons. I just fail to see how it's a justification for recieving charity.
I mean how does that work? Give charity to those that have the most?
|
Don't give it, who is making you? lol u r saying it is as if you are obligated to give it and someone has demanded u do... chillout haha.
You know your argument would be stronger if you said it like this...
"Haiti is less developed than Japan and has experienced a greater level of devastation compared to Japan. The government doesn't have insurance systems like the developed world and they cannot provide aid because the infra-structure is not good either. Between the two, Haiti has the greatest need.
So if you will be donating to Japan, consider Haiti and while you donate select 'Where the need is greatest'. This will give the Charity the opportunity to allocate their resources to where it is needed most in other projects in 3rd world countries also."
If you say it like that, it doesn't sound weird. But the way you are saying it, is as though it's something personal for you.... 'I'm not giving them a cent'. There's no need for that.