View Single Post
(#681 (permalink))
Old
fluffy0000's Avatar
fluffy0000 (Offline)
FJ to JF
 
Posts: 236
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: lost coast , kalifornia, uSa
again sorta not - 03-19-2011, 04:26 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sangetsu View Post
Even if there were a full, Chernobyl-style meltdown, Tokyo would not be substantially affected, nor would anyone outside Japan. Yet the news hype is so great that people in America are buying potassium iodide pills, which would only be necessary in the worst-case scenario and you were within 12 miles of the plant. If these idiots are dumb enough to start taking iodine undirected, they are likely to develop thyroid problems more serious than if they had been exposed to radiation.
Dude, that's your quote not mine.
Take a deep breath and get off your soap box.

look at your quote above that lists the Chernobyl design from 1942'?
The Soviet Union built it's first nuclear reactor in 1946'.

Now take a chill pill.
And actually read your own post.
You posted 'the Chernobyl style meltdown' not me get a grip.

(IAEA) International Atomic Energy Agency and World Health Organization (WHO) has already gone on record with the 2005' Chernoybl Forum Report
regarding the expected death toll from the 1986' Chernobyl accident will be additional 4,000 deaths related to cancer besides the 56 direct deaths.

Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment, authored by Dr. Alexey Yablokov, Dr. Vassily Nesterenko and Dr. Alexey Nesterenko
Again. nothing to do with your 'chernobyl style meltdown fantasy' - this book was published in 2010 by New York Academy of Sciences
Is about the health consequences concerning radiation fallout.

Last edited by fluffy0000 : 03-19-2011 at 05:02 AM.
Reply With Quote