View Single Post
(#682 (permalink))
Old
GoNative (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,063
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Inverloch, Australia
03-19-2011, 04:41 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by fluffy0000 View Post
Tell the designers of the Mark 1 that they were overreacting, dude.

Fukushima: Mark 1 Nuclear Reactor Design Caused GE Scientist To Quit In Protest
ABC News the blotter
Damaged Japanese Nuclear Plant Has Five Mark 1 Reactors
By MATTHEW MOSK
March 15, 2011 excerpt: article

Thirty-five years ago, Dale G. Bridenbaugh and two of his colleagues at General Electric resigned from their jobs after becoming increasingly convinced that the nuclear reactor design they were reviewing -- the Mark 1 -- was so flawed it could lead to a devastating accident.
Questions persisted for decades about the ability of the Mark 1 to handle the immense pressures that would result if the reactor lost cooling power, and today that design is being put to the ultimate test in Japan. Five of the six reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, which has been wracked since Friday's earthquake with explosions and radiation leaks, are Mark 1s.

"The problems we identified in 1975 were that, in doing the design of the containment, they did not take into account the dynamic loads that could be experienced with a loss of coolant,"
So what has that got to do with the idiots in the US buying up iodine? Nothing whatsoever. Last I heard no reactors in the US regardless of their design had experienced a loss of their coolant systems. As usual though we see the US desire to find someone or something to blame. There's got to be someone hasn't there so a class action can be organised? Gladly I doubt you'll see anything like that here in Japan.
Reply With Quote