And this, ladies and gentlemen, is called " Trolling out those who know better but for some reason won't speak out, and again facebook becomes information source for those in serious need of reassurances". I'm thinking about renaming it.
Thanks for the corrections. Some were indeed due to honest misunderstanding (those are better out than in), but some where well-used propaganda technique to take example in the farthest side of the direction the opponent is going and ridiculing that. Oh well, sometimes it works.
I do have extreme opinions about how to handle radioactive exposure above the background level. I earned them with relevant academic grades AND experience as someone in charge of factory's radiation safety. I never had the emotional luxury of statistics, I had to look those people in the eye. And since I did not fail anybody, I don't need to understand actions of those who let little
children piss cesium and tell them "everything is actually really good!". That's not how human world works.
(Can anybody guess which propaganda technique was used there?
)
I said before and will say again, going to Fukushima won't probably come to a bad end, but aggressive zero-tolerance towards increase in radiation exposure is not only proven to be possible, it is also the only ethical approach.