Quote:
Originally Posted by Supperman
I thought RADIO programs were better to listen to than TV programs, because RADIO programs were intended to make for listeners, while TV's were for watchers.
Yet, to the contrary, I heard from plural visually handicapped people that TV programs were better than radio programs, when they listen to them.
I though of the reason, and my conclusion was;
TV programs have higher performance than RADIO programs, because TV programs use much money to produce.
A radio jockey can't talk all through one program, so their speech is interrupted by musics.
So if one want to listens to someone's voice instead of music, one may prefer to listen to TV program.
Though I don't know it is correct or not.
|
My guess would be that radio has to communicate using words alone, whereas TV can make use of body language and situational context.
In that respect, tv would be much more similar to conversational English.
Even when regular people speak on the phone, they aren't trained as radio announcers and would still use conversational English more similar to TV English than Radio.
Just a guess though.