View Single Post
(#16 (permalink))
Old
fluffy0000's Avatar
fluffy0000 (Offline)
FJ to JF
 
Posts: 236
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: lost coast , kalifornia, uSa
sorta not - 07-31-2011, 09:36 PM

Tell that to the judge dude,..
note the date of NHSTA report date is Feb 2011' and it is a unredacted report.

Toyota Plaintiffs Insist They Need a Look at Government Findings

Amanda Bronstad
The National Law Journal
March 18, 2011
From The National Law Journal

"Toyota has refused to provide unredacted copies of the full report
As recently as March 14,2011 Toyota's lawyers opposed a request for the report, but Selna told them to turn over an unredacted version of it once security issues surrounding Toyota's source code, which the report discusses, are agreed upon by the parties."

note regarding NHTSA Feb 2011 report:

"As recently as March 14,2011' Toyota's lawyers opposed a request for the report, but Judge Selna told them to turn over an unredacted version of it once security issues surrounding Toyota's source code, which the report discusses, are agreed upon by the parties."


April 29 2011' (Bloomberg) -- A federal judge overseeing lawsuits against Toyota Motor Corp. said the automaker will have to face economic loss claims over unintended acceleration allegations.

U.S. District Judge James V. Selna in Santa Ana, California, said the claims could go forward because vehicle owners met court standards on pleading loss or injury.

Selna also said in the tentative ruling he wouldn’t dismiss claims that Toyota violated consumer laws by not disclosing sudden acceleration problems to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration or to car buyers.

Last edited by fluffy0000 : 07-31-2011 at 09:39 PM. Reason: edit
Reply With Quote