View Single Post
(#108 (permalink))
Old
Sangetsu's Avatar
Sangetsu (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,346
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 東京都
10-06-2011, 08:13 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoNative View Post
Absolute rubbish again. Few things that not you nor anyone else can argue against are;

C02 is a greendhouse gas. That knowledge has been around for over 150 years.
C02 is inextricably linked to temperature throughout the climate record. Periods of high temperature have high concentrations of C02 in the atmosphere.
Humans through their use of fossil fuels and deforestation have had a significant impact on the increase of C02 in our atmosphere.
This has led to a warming forcing on temperatures in the lower atmosphere.

Are there many other factors which affect climate? Yes.
Do these mean that mankind is not affecting the climate through increasing the concentrations of C02 (and other greenhouse gases) in the atmosphere. No.

There is absolutely nothing to refute anything I've written above. Nothing whatsoever. The science of AGW was around long, long before it ever became a political issue. Long, long before there was any organised conservation movement worldwide. And long, long before conspiracy nuts had access to the internet.

Again I would really love for you to show us links to some of the websites you get your information from. It would be an absolute laugh for the rest of us to see where you get all your crazy crap. You're certainly not intelligent enough to have come up with any of this yourself. So come on show us the nutty right wing extremist sites you get this tripe from.

This is only partially correct. C02 is a greenhouse gas only at a certain concentration. There is a saturation point that once reached, will not contain more heat.

Moreover, the past ties between C02 and temperature increase was inverse to the situation today, C02 increased FOLLOWING temperature increaese, it was not the cause, it was the effect. Am I not right? Please keep your facts accurate.
Reply With Quote