JapanForum.com

JapanForum.com (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/)
-   General Discussion (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/)
-   -   Can I blame you for Global Warming? (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/22596-can-i-blame-you-global-warming.html)

HiroKazu 01-21-2009 04:05 AM

Can I blame you for Global Warming?
 
I do not know why countries blame each other if all contributed.
Each country have industries wich polute the atmosphere.


So, Do you think that we can blame a country or all countries?
Why?


... I was thinking about this so,
Do you think that Global Warming is a period wich is happening to the Earth as Ice Age?
Yes or No? Why?

Keaton421 01-21-2009 04:07 AM

Every country that has a single automobile, air conditioner, aerosol can, or factory is guilty to some degree.

CarleyGee 01-21-2009 04:12 AM

That is . . . if global warming is even real.

CarleyGee 01-21-2009 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenchu (Post 667252)
You hit your head?

It's only a theory. (Well the part of it being caused by people)

Keaton421 01-21-2009 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenchu (Post 667251)
Industry, polution, carbon emissions, it isn't all that bad. Actually, we genuinly need some carbon in the atmosphere to be stable. It is the scale/quantity that matters.

It is too late to turn back now, anyway. People seem to have a fairy tale notion that what we have built can never be destroyed, and our civilization will last for forever. They seem to think men like Obama, with new, better policies can change and fix everything. But he is still leading the same people, and those people wont change and are too numerous.

Too late to trun back; suppose I'll just take it as it comes and give a whole hearted farewell to that of the world my arrogant species of animal is destroying.

Yeah, I think there's a pretty big threshold for how much carbon the atmosphere can take. There are just lots of wasteful things we can do, and if we fixed them that would turn the tide backwards.

HiroKazu 01-21-2009 04:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keaton421 (Post 667255)
Yeah, I think there's a pretty big threshold for how much carbon the atmosphere can take. There are just lots of wasteful things we can do, and if we fixed them that would turn the tide backwards.

Hmmmmmmmm Yeah but the problem is that we produce a surplus carbon dioxide (CO2) and that polute the things that makes you do easy things like use sprays for your hair, people will not take that away as easy, I think that is just not reducing the use but using others materials as some countries are using Ethanol from the corns that is a good way. But still some that we have change yet.

Keaton421 01-21-2009 04:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarleyGee (Post 667254)
It's only a theory. (Well the part of it being caused by people)

Carley, honey... get your head out of your ass! :D Do you think the stuff we pump into the atmosphere is good for it? I know this is something that's hard to come to grips with, but we have to if we're gonna fix it.

CarleyGee 01-21-2009 04:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenchu (Post 667259)
So is evolution. Get over it.

It is a theory constructed of facts. Yes, we are responsible. You don't have to look very hard to see what we have done to this planet. Before our population boom the world was a perfect machine of rain forest and oceans, rivers and mountains, volcanoes and plains... we have litterally destroyed the majority of this machine, destroying that which filters the atmosphere whilst refilling it with polutants... and you think this theory has holes in it?

Though we haven't been documenting it enough to see if it's
a type of climate change that happens every 300 years or so?
(Just an example)

Theory's aren't proven, which means they can still be false.
Which means there is no evidence it is true, which means I
still have a chance at being right and so do you.

CarleyGee 01-21-2009 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenchu (Post 667268)
No, Obama fed you bullshit to win an election.

Ha, I agree with that! :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenchu (Post 667266)
The world is overpopulated, but. Not to mention that 80% of the world lives on less than $2 US per day. By 2050 there will be a population double from now (estimates predict). It'll be over 10 billion people. Not to mention, lifting poverty raises consumerism. A consumerism the planet can not feed on that scale.

It is not just carbon in the atmosphere, Keaton, it is every single person here, and the amount of produce they consume every single day. It is too much. It wont work.

Eh, I do agree there are too many people which leads to more pollution.

Keaton421 01-21-2009 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenchu (Post 667266)
The world is overpopulated, but. Not to mention that 80% of the world lives on less than $2 US per day. By 2050 there will be a population double from now (estimates predict). It'll be over 10 billion people. Not to mention, lifting poverty raises consumerism. A consumerism the planet can not feed on that scale.

It is not just carbon in the atmosphere, Keaton, it is every single person here, and the amount of produce they consume every single day. It is too much. It wont work.


Yeah, you're right. With 6 billion people, the world is basically fucked unless we do something about it.

MMM 01-21-2009 04:34 AM

Gravity is also an unproven threory, but I won't walk near the edge of cliffs.

HiroKazu 01-21-2009 04:34 AM

xD in the Earth will be a time wich you will have to pay to breath 12-20 atoms of Oxygen around how much? 100 dollards lol nah nah I was kidding but this ins't a joke

Keaton421 01-21-2009 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenchu (Post 667274)
Well double it. What will 2050 be like?

And unless we can improve our technology, or something, we'll literally be swimming in garbage and breathing pure gasoline fumes

HiroKazu 01-21-2009 04:44 AM

do you think if Global Warming get worse, the governments and the NASA will move the people to other planet? Sometimes I think that IDK why lol
but what do you think about it?

zed 01-21-2009 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarleyGee (Post 667264)
Though we haven't been documenting it enough to see if it's
a type of climate change that happens every 300 years or so?
(Just an example)

Theory's aren't proven, which means they can still be false.
Which means there is no evidence it is true, which means I
still have a chance at being right and so do you.

that's called living in denial, if you dont want to change your ways it's fine, but the problen is still there, you can look away if that's your choice, the facts are there just get informed, google the thig and it's going to be hard not to agree.

MMM 01-21-2009 07:00 AM

I am so glad that Obama has made SCIENCE a high priority in his administration. He is putting respected scientists and researchers back into power so we can get away from this backwards idea that scientists are shifty-eyed nerds trying to steal our bibles. Thanks for that, W!

Hopefully we have time to catch up!

Sangetsu 01-21-2009 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenchu (Post 667252)
You hit your head?


Global warming is not real, that's why it is now called "climate change". The name changed when it became apparent that temperatures were not getting hotter.

Cold weather records were broken in many parts of the world last year, and this year is cold as well. Temperatures in Japan are lower than average this year, only one day in the last two weeks has been average, every other day (including today) has been colder.

Japan has been a great believer in the global warming theory, and television stations have been keeping careful track of the daily temperatures, comparing them with historical averages.

We'd better hope that the temperature levels off, or increases again soon. Global warming could have been a problem, but global cooling would be genuinely catastrophic.

Sangetsu 01-21-2009 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMM (Post 667336)
I am so glad that Obama has made SCIENCE a high priority in his administration. He is putting respected scientists and researchers back into power so we can get away from this backwards idea that scientists are shifty-eyed nerds trying to steal our bibles. Thanks for that, W!

Hopefully we have time to catch up!


I hope his scientists are just that, scientists. Too many "scientists" are selected because of their political ideology rather than the genuine merit of their work.

Throughout the world research which has been critical of global warming or climate change has been intentionally ignored and unfunded.

Hall of Record: Extreme Temperatures - Where's the Global Warming?

Government scientists are paid by the government, and if they wish to keep getting paid, they tell the government what it wants to hear, rather than what it needs to hear.

noodle 01-21-2009 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenchu (Post 667259)
So is evolution. Get over it.

It is a theory constructed of facts. Yes, we are responsible. You don't have to look very hard to see what we have done to this planet. Before our population boom the world was a perfect machine of rain forest and oceans, rivers and mountains, volcanoes and plains... we have litterally destroyed the majority of this machine, destroying that which filters the atmosphere whilst refilling it with polutants... and you think this theory has holes in it?

Tenchu, destroying the planet doesn't prove that we've created Global Warming... You of all people should know the cycles of the Earth as you're so interested in Natural Sciences. There aren't nearly enough facts to prove that Global warming is human made. In fact, if I had to choose between Evolution theory and Man made Global warming, I'd rather choose Evolution to be more likely!

noodle 01-21-2009 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMM (Post 667273)
Gravity is also an unproven threory, but I won't walk near the edge of cliffs.

MMM, that's has nothing to do with anything. That's like saying you being alive isn't really proven (it could all be a dream for example), so there is no need for you to go live your life:rolleyes:

I wanna ask most of you a question I was asked at uni. Note, most science students weren't able to give a fully correct answer to this question.

What is science?

Also, try to not be tempted to search for it on google or something. Try to give an honest answer without any kind of cheating.

vaskajaheta 01-21-2009 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HiroKazu (Post 667284)
do you think if Global Warming get worse, the governments and the NASA will move the people to other planet? Sometimes I think that IDK why lol
but what do you think about it?

haha good one XD ROFLMAO!!

CrazyLee 01-21-2009 01:07 PM

Okay, here's a question to everyone that believes that Global Warming (or the new pc version: Climate change) - has it killed anyone yet? Can you prove to me that the changes to our atmosphere/climate/planet have actually contributed to the death of even 1 individual? If yes, then its a problem. If you cannot, then its not a problem.
We've been 'polluting' this world for over 2,000 years (I dont know how many exactly, but I'll go by the current year + lots ;)), why the sudden belief that our technological develpoment is to blame?

noodle 01-21-2009 01:50 PM

Tenchu, you've mentioned a lot. I haven't got the time to reply just now, but I promise, I'll reply soon. Just wanted to tell you not to worry about my studying. Global warming has been shoved in my face at school for the past 8 years and on TV/media for the past god knows how many years.

I've never accepted anything as fact when teachers presented is as that. I got this habbit after studying at a christian school. So, since I was taught about global warming, I've read up about it by myself. Thankfully, here at uni, in my geology classes, I've managed to gain more insight into the matter and it seems even geologists don't always agree that Man made global warming is true. That however doesn't mean that human's haven't contributed. To believe they haven't is a little silly, but to believe that we've caused such a huge affect is silly also.

Edit: Instincts tell me not to jump off a cliff too! Doesn't mean anything towards living life or existance of gravity

Sangetsu 01-21-2009 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenchu (Post 667382)
I'm not so sure, Noodle... here we go again...

The planet has been way hotter before, it is okay, but before it happened slowly, things had time to adjust. The expected rate of change now is quite quick. It will disrupt things.

I don't know what facts you expect to see. I don't think you study enough, really. No offence.

Carbon dioxide is what traps heat in the atmosphere.

Here is my view; the only things that really produce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are decaying living things and volcanoes. Is it not possible the human emissions out weigh that of these forces? I think it is, but havn't actually seen the stats. Can't find 'em.

The greatest processor of carbon dioxide is plants and plankton. The plankton is microscopic, but together they are so abundant they can be seen from space; they are what turns the sea green.

Plankton uses crabon dioxide to make its shell. It dies, the shell falls to the bottom of the ocean and solidifies. As the plates shift, the carbon dioxide funnels underground slowly, the high temperatures cause it to heat, and it bursts out into the air again through volcanoes.

We have also found a use for dead plankton; oil; the fossil fuel. So, is it not possible we have seemingly doubled, tripled, or more the amount of what would be volcano fuel going into the atmosphere?

Plants also consume carbon dioxide. As they die, they decompose. This, mostly, goes straight up, or feeds rich soil. We are destroying the forests that process it, not only releasing the carbon dioxide in the forests, but also taking away the massive filter of the planet. Not to mention, the effect this has on the water we need for farming; 40% of the rain is made by our disappearing trees, making for more baron landscapes.

Moreover, carbon dioxide is not the only heat trapping gas. As plants die they are consumed by micro scopic organisms. These organisms produce methane as a by product. In other words, they fart. The frozen forests of places like siberia more than less decompose much slower, and produce less carbon dioxide. The catch would be that the dead plants are then consumed under the frozen tundra by these little fuc*ers. Their methane remains trapped in the perma frost; the frozen soil of constantly iced up land scapes.

The bad thing would be that as the planet heats, this will cause the release of this gas as the frost melts, speeding it up even more. Not to mention the lack of ice that can no longer reflect the suns heat. But those things are not our fault, you can see how we can trigger chain reactions.

Finnally, I'd like to add, the troposphere (first layer of the atmosphere) is made by life. Living things made it. It started with stromatolites, they produce oxygen as a bi product, like other plants, some couple billion years back or so. Life made this atmosphere, it has, in the past, altered it, often with catastrophic concequences, and it can, in the future, alter it again and even destroy it.

Lastly, I'd like to express my opinion that carbon emissions are only a fraction of the problem of what over population is.



There are these one people; nihilist... you should look into it.

Personally, I do not think there is a point to continue living, but my will to do so is natural. It is just the way I am, and I am who I am. There is no point to change that, either (who I am, that is).

Anyway, what MMM said has a point. I think you bent it.



Science is creative exploring. Imagination. Collecting facts, testing them, even challenging yourself by proving yourself wrong. Ultimately, science is faith in your theory.

Science has nothing to do with challenging yourself or others. Real science is the cold and impersonal gathering of facts. Science has nothing to do with faith. Faith implies belief, while science searches for the truth, and we all know that faith and truth are often opposites of each other.

Co2 is a minor greenhouse gas, and it has never been shown in history to cause global warming. Even IPCC scientists admit that Co2 levels in the past and present follow heat increases, and to not precipitate them. The other "major" greenhouse gas is methane, for which cows have been blamed for producing in huge quantities. But, methane levels have been decreasing for the lat 10 years, and no one yet knows why.

Man has actually done a lot to the environment which causes global cooling. The vast farmlands of the American midwest and other parts of the world reflect large amounts of the sun's energy away from the earth, and these farms cover more area than the world's cities, which are blamed for causing global "hot spots".

Man cannot destroy the world, even if he made an organized attempt to do it. The world has endured far worse disasters than man is capable of. More species have become extinct in the past than exist in life now, and man is responsible only for the tiniest fraction of the smallest percent.

"Climate change" is nothing but a political movement designed to spread socialist ideology, a new wealth redistribution scheme which is aimed at the industries and economies of the developed world. "Climate change" would more accurately be called "Eco Socialism", because that's what it really is.

Aniki 01-21-2009 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyLee (Post 667386)
Okay, here's a question to everyone that believes that Global Warming (or the new pc version: Climate change) - has it killed anyone yet? Can you prove to me that the changes to our atmosphere/climate/planet have actually contributed to the death of even 1 individual? If yes, then its a problem. If you cannot, then its not a problem.
We've been 'polluting' this world for over 2,000 years (I dont know how many exactly, but I'll go by the current year + lots ;)), why the sudden belief that our technological develpoment is to blame?

The people who die from hurricanes, in which the numbers of them are increasing form global warming every year isn't enough for you? And since when do we need human casualties to understand that this a huge problem?

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyLee (Post 667386)
We've been 'polluting' this world for over 2,000 years (I dont know how many exactly, but I'll go by the current year + lots ;)), why the sudden belief that our technological develpoment is to blame?

2,000 years? A little bit overdramatic, don't you think?
Starting from stone age to the industrial times the pollution was nothing compared with the pollution in these days, because in those times the human population wasn't so big as it is right now, trees weren't cut that much as they are right now, and people weren't dependent so much from oil and natural gas as they are right now.

Eiri 01-21-2009 06:26 PM

I feel like bashing someones head up against the wall everytime I hear "global warming doesnt exist" :mad:

Lee, its true global warming hasnt killed anyone, but its killing out planet. Our home. So much pollution in the air and water for so many years is and does have an effect on the planet. If you havent notice (or just havent bothered to) the polar ice caps are melting, you want proof of that look up pictures of them, what 30, 40 yrs ago? and find a more recent pircture of the ice caps now and give me one good explanation as to why so much ice is gone. As an effect of the ice melting, the ocean is rising. Small islands are going to dissapear and beaches are going to get smaller and the ocean is going to start creeping up into the town/cities/villages that are close to the beach. Plus I've noticed changes in the weather. I moved to Florida from PR in 03 and the summer was hot as hell and the winter freezing (at least for me:rolleyes: ) now the summer are hotter than I remember and this last october was cold. It wasnt last year or the years before that. And in december, where I once remembered it being cold/freezing the years before, this year it was warm. {Has anyone else notice changes in the weather??? :/}

Also few of us have to deal with hurricanes and such, but those of us who have had to,
1- have noticed that the few that form their intencity that there starting to form themselves is stronger than years before
and 2- should have noticed that if you havent:rolleyes:

And somewhere in the thread someone mentioned the forests that used to be abundant thru out the planet, ppl keep in mind that plants and trees is where we get our clean oxygen from >.>

And someone pointed a finger at the factories(and some other stuff) that every single country has(even if its just one, small factory), and yes they are the blame for the mass amount of carbon dioxide that is being released into the atmosphere, and yes the atmosphere already has carbon dioxide naturaly but to much of it is whats causing global warming, so since factories are created by humans, yes we are to blame for throwing our planet downt the shit hole.

zed 01-21-2009 10:20 PM

ok contributing to other's facts here are some of what I know about

- Eleven of last 12 years were the hottest ever recorded
That's since 1850. And the high temperatures of the last 50 years are unusual for at least the last 1300 years.

- We are dumping about 1000 tons of CO2 per second into the atmosphere Current rates of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere are unprecedented. Carbon dioxide emissions are mostly from burning fossil fuels.

- The current atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide is 35% greater than pre-industrial levels.and contrary to what someone said Methane concentrations have increased by 250%. These dramatic increases in greenhouse gases are human-caused.

- Global warming produces severe weather and rising seas.
Warming oceans and melting ice have caused the sea level to rise at a rate unprecedented in the last 3000 years. Other changes associated with warming include increased incidences of drought, flooding, heat waves, and intense cyclones.

- Global warming effects are predicted to get much worse
By 2100, global temperatures will increase another 2 to 11 °F. Increases are predicted in heat waves, drought, intense cyclones, and loss of coastal and low areas.

- Global warming will affect millions of people by 2100
Loss of habitable land is predicted to result from flooding and droughts. Increases are predicted in heat-caused deaths, famines, drinking water scarcity, disease, and forest fires.

- 25% of the world's species could be lost from global warming effects
More than 1 million plant and animal species will vanish if global temperatures continue to rise as predicted in the next 50 years.

- China plans to build about one coal-fired electrical power plant per week over a period of a decade
The US currently emits more greenhouse gases than any other nation, but China will soon pass the US as the worst greenhouse gas emitter.

- It's too late to stop global warming, but we can limit it
Models show that limiting greenhouse gas emissions can prevent the most extreme scenarios for global warming.

As I said maibe you (those who find hard to hold people accountable for global warming) dont want to change the way they live, its your choice, but I bet you can't contradict the facts.

noodle 01-21-2009 10:40 PM

Everytime someone mentions the melting of ice-caps, I can't help but think they're just brainwashed from media... If you check any reputed oceantologist that has concentrated their research around this particular area of the planet, you will see that the melting and freezing of ice-caps is cyclic. So, to state such a thing with certainty makes you look foolish. BUT anyway, lets forget that and say yes, they are just melting because the planet is hot!!! How does that in any way prove it's man made heat (GW)? It is a result of the earth warming up. The earth warming up isn't a result of the ice-caps melting (ooops, I forgot the reflections right???). If you take the ice caps melting to be a cause to the earth warming up, then you're in a paradox (I'll let you figure that out). If you believe it's a contributer, then you should read up on some oceantologists' research...

HiroKazu 01-21-2009 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenchu (Post 667384)
How old are you?

Im 16

why?

superheel 01-21-2009 11:17 PM

No one is really to be blamed for Global Warming. But we humans should do our part. I mean, Global Warming is true, and no matter how you deny it, it's true.

superheel 01-21-2009 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyLee (Post 667386)
Okay, here's a question to everyone that believes that Global Warming (or the new pc version: Climate change) - has it killed anyone yet? Can you prove to me that the changes to our atmosphere/climate/planet have actually contributed to the death of even 1 individual? If yes, then its a problem. If you cannot, then its not a problem.
We've been 'polluting' this world for over 2,000 years (I dont know how many exactly, but I'll go by the current year + lots ;)), why the sudden belief that our technological develpoment is to blame?

There's a difference between now and 2000 years ago. Technology uses chemicals which are not present 2000 years ago. So, I think that's a valiud answer to that. Because 2000 years ago, all men can do to pollute earth is trash and fire. Actually, there's not alot of trash back then.

zed 01-21-2009 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noodle (Post 667545)
Everytime someone mentions the melting of ice-caps, I can't help but think they're just brainwashed from media... If you check any reputed oceantologist that has concentrated their research around this particular area of the planet, you will see that the melting and freezing of ice-caps is cyclic. So, to state such a thing with certainty makes you look foolish. BUT anyway, lets forget that and say yes, they are just melting because the planet is hot!!! How does that in any way prove it's man made heat (GW)? It is a result of the earth warming up. The earth warming up isn't a result of the ice-caps melting (ooops, I forgot the reflections right???). If you take the ice caps melting to be a cause to the earth warming up, then you're in a paradox (I'll let you figure that out). If you believe it's a contributer, then you should read up on some oceantologists' research...

ok i followed your advice and this is what I have found.

Anxious about global warming

yes there is an opinion and research of ONE OCEANOLOGIST
but but if you read the the second article, there is a warning firmed by 1500 of the most renoun scientists and novel prices about how we have poluted the earth, and they agree global warming is real.

don't know about you but I think this guy is yust trying to make himself a name going against what almost all agree.

ivi0nk3y 01-21-2009 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zed (Post 667569)
ok i followed your advice and this is what I have found.

Anxious about global warming

yes there is an opinion and research of ONE OCEANOLOGIST
but but if you read the the second article, there is a warning firmed by 1500 of the most renoun scientists and novel prices about how we have poluted the earth, and they agree global warming is real.

don't know about you but I think this guy is yust trying to make himself a name going against what almost all agree.

Lol the fact is that ONE OCEANOLOGIST has facts which the other 1500 have failed to come up with. It is based on that, not what he says, that any intelligent would form an opinion.

zed 01-22-2009 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ivi0nk3y (Post 667575)
Lol the fact is that ONE OCEANOLOGIST has facts which the other 1500 have failed to come up with. It is based on that, not what he says, that any intelligent would form an opinion.

did you read the article you just posted what you think,
as you said information is needed to form an opinion.
also I have given you another set of facts that refute what this oceanologist implies.

ivi0nk3y 01-22-2009 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zed (Post 667578)
did you read the article you just posted what you think,
as you said information is needed to form an opinion.
also I have given you another set of facts that refute what this oceanologist implies.

Yes I read the article. Its findings are 16-17 years old, an eternity in scientific terms.

There have been many more findings since then.

zed 01-22-2009 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ivi0nk3y (Post 667582)
Yes I read the article. Its findings are 16-17 years old, an eternity in scientific terms.

There have been many more findings since then.

exactly, also the warning was made in 1996 and I think nobody paid attention and the efects of it are showing, now most people recognise it.

ivi0nk3y 01-22-2009 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zed (Post 667587)
exactly, also the warning was made in 1996 and I think nobody paid attention and the efects of it are showing, now most people recognise it.

I mean that there have been findings and more research to the contrary.

zed 01-22-2009 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ivi0nk3y (Post 667593)
I mean that there have been findings and more research to the contrary.

I know what you mean, yust playing with your words alittle, sorry about that,
but really there is research from both sides of the theme, just saying that in my research,
there is more credibility in the side of global warming, and for the experiences I have: as aresult of it semidesertic areas are transforming into total deserts, or at least are in severe drought for afew years now, I know afew places were it's already a reality.

And also I know that most of the researches against it are sponsored by car companies and the oil produccion industry.

Sangetsu 01-22-2009 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aniki (Post 667422)
The people who die from hurricanes, in which the numbers of them are increasing form global warming every year isn't enough for you? And since when do we need human casualties to understand that this a huge problem?



2,000 years? A little bit overdramatic, don't you think?
Starting from stone age to the industrial times the pollution was nothing compared with the pollution in these days, because in those times the human population wasn't so big as it is right now, trees weren't cut that much as they are right now, and people weren't dependent so much from oil and natural gas as they are right now.

I know all about hurricanes, having lived in Florida for many years. America's former national hurricane expert says "global warming" is not true. Sea temperatures are no long increasing, and haven't increased in years. There were far more and stronger hurricanes in the early 20th century than there are now.

Don't speak about something you know nothing about. That is the problem with this entire debate, people repeat things they've heard about global warming, somehow thinking that because they've heard it on the news or read it in a book that it must be true.

Look at the numbers and charts yourself, but look at the newer ones. Global warming proponents are still showing graphs formulated before Nasa indicated the flaw in their temperature measuring system, which changed the hottest year on record from 2005 to 1936. You are being lied to by the global warming/climate change crowd, and don't realize it.

Sangetsu 01-22-2009 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eiri (Post 667452)
I feel like bashing someones head up against the wall everytime I hear "global warming doesnt exist" :mad:

Lee, its true global warming hasnt killed anyone, but its killing out planet. Our home. So much pollution in the air and water for so many years is and does have an effect on the planet. If you havent notice (or just havent bothered to) the polar ice caps are melting, you want proof of that look up pictures of them, what 30, 40 yrs ago? and find a more recent pircture of the ice caps now and give me one good explanation as to why so much ice is gone. As an effect of the ice melting, the ocean is rising. Small islands are going to dissapear and beaches are going to get smaller and the ocean is going to start creeping up into the town/cities/villages that are close to the beach. Plus I've noticed changes in the weather. I moved to Florida from PR in 03 and the summer was hot as hell and the winter freezing (at least for me:rolleyes: ) now the summer are hotter than I remember and this last october was cold. It wasnt last year or the years before that. And in december, where I once remembered it being cold/freezing the years before, this year it was warm. {Has anyone else notice changes in the weather??? :/}

Also few of us have to deal with hurricanes and such, but those of us who have had to,
1- have noticed that the few that form their intencity that there starting to form themselves is stronger than years before
and 2- should have noticed that if you havent:rolleyes:

And somewhere in the thread someone mentioned the forests that used to be abundant thru out the planet, ppl keep in mind that plants and trees is where we get our clean oxygen from >.>

And someone pointed a finger at the factories(and some other stuff) that every single country has(even if its just one, small factory), and yes they are the blame for the mass amount of carbon dioxide that is being released into the atmosphere, and yes the atmosphere already has carbon dioxide naturaly but to much of it is whats causing global warming, so since factories are created by humans, yes we are to blame for throwing our planet downt the shit hole.

Try and bash my head child. Global warming is not real.

Here's some logic for you. What is pollution, and where does if come from?

Where are the rising sea levels promised by the climate change crowd? You live in Florida, don't you? Have you noticed that the sea level is the same? That, in fact, it has not changed so much as an inch since measurements have been kept?

You say that this last summer was the hottest one you've experienced, have you looked at the average temperatures over the last 100 years to see if that is really true? It's not, you'll find that last summer, and the summers before it were cooler than the summers of the early 20th century. 2005 was the only year which came close, and each summer since then has actually been cooler.

Global warming is not happening, that's why it is now called "climate change".

Read: Friends of Science


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:54 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6