Originally Posted by nvn (Post 858404)

It is true. It is impossible to detain or stop energy emission. But it is possible to redirect it to a deserted place.
Japan has such place - Pacific ocean.

Originally Posted by nvn (Post 858426)

The tsunami from earthquake near to coast and a tsunami from earthquake far from coast differ from each other.

Originally Posted by nvn (Post 858533)

In February 2010 prospective epicenter of earthquake in Carpathians shifted towards Arctic regions to the north of Iceland, but energy emission has occurred in Iceland.

Originally Posted by Sawromat (Post 858236)

"The forecast of large destructive earthquake in Japan has been published in magazine" Works of professorial club of UNESCO "in 1997. We foretold that in 2011 in area Kanto there will be a series of pushes force of 10 points and above. This part of the country has undergone to the strongest destruction", - the interlocutor of agency has told.

Российские ученые прогнозировали землетрясение в Японии в 1997 году | Хроника | РИА Новости



2) Earlier Valery Abramov in conversation with the correspondent of RIA Novosti news agency has told that scientists of the Russian Far East predicted
Present destructive earthquake in Japan. They have published article about it in 1997 in magazine "Works of professorial club of UNESCO" and having informed on it the country power through consulate general in Vladivostok.

"Activization of seismic activity in the North America is expected. In the central part of the USA there is a triangle" KALUG ", named on capital letters - Kansas and Louisville. In a southern part of a triangle already there was a tragedy - it was heated. Now seismic events of the big force there are expected. I don't name the period not to cause a panic... Also in the near future will be sejsmoopasen caucasus", - the interlocutor of agency has told.
Why there are earthquakes.

As he said, the interested when there will be earthquakes, can address in with official inquiry in Far East branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Abrams hasn't specified, how much strong earthquake on caucasus is expected, however has let know that it can be not less destructive, rather than spitakskoe in which result was lost 25 thousand persons.


P.S. Vladivostok, 17 mar - RIA Novosti news agency, Maria Okulov. Earthquake will occur in the near future in the USA, and also on Caucas, the laboratory chief of regional geology and tektonofiziki Pacific institute DVO of the Russian Academy of Sciences Valery Abramov has informed RIA Novosti news agency on Thursday.

Ученый, предсказавший бедствие Японии, предупреждает США об опасности | Последствия | РИА Новости

Originally Posted by protheus (Post 858559)

LOL, I can't stop laughing, omg.

Originally Posted by Nyororin (Post 858508)

I don`t know why I`m bothering to reply to this... I guess I just find it incredibly amusing that someone thinks that it would be possible to move the epicenters of large earthquakes far far away from their fault lines.

I`m sure they do - but the tsunami reached California. You would be willing to sacrifice some other location with your magical method of moving an epicenter? Moving it a bit isn`t going to do anything but reduce the amount of shaking felt - the difference in tsunami size would be negligible. Unless, of course, you can somehow just take all the energy far far far away from the fault line and drop it in Antarctica or the like.

Originally Posted by GoNative (Post 858583)

It is all completely ridiculous and yes somewhat amusing. But we are seeing our fair share of nutters on these forums since the quake...