|
|||
Conjugation help please? -
03-06-2010, 01:41 PM
I'm having trouble understanding conjugation.
Mainly, because i'm using My japanes coach, and while it's good for increasing vocabulary and writing, it's doing a HORRIBLE job with the transition to japanese. It's explaining conjugation with Romaji characters. Anyhow. It mentions these "bases". Seven of them in total. Could anyone be so kind as to explain Conjugation using Bases instead of Romaji? i can't seem to find a pattern there. |
|
||||
03-06-2010, 11:29 PM
Quote:
食べなさい and the honorific and humble forms—although 食べる doesn't particularly have "conjugations" for these like, say, 作る, which has: お作りになる お作りする |
|
|||
03-07-2010, 02:30 AM
Quote:
Having said that, I'm not really qualified to teach you Japanese or offer advice about how to learn the language, but if you are a beginner learner I'd advise you to forget about all of the above words and stick with explanations like Kyle provided here. The reason is that these "kei" things are based on a historical grammar and take some bending to fit with modern Japanese. |
|
||||
03-07-2010, 04:54 PM
Quote:
Yes, OP, listen to the above post: the seven forms of verb don't fit perfectly with modern Japanese. For example, the mizenkei (未然形) is the stem before 〜ず/ざり/etc. It's basically the "imperfect" form ("not yet happened" form). Or so says my copy of A Handbook to Classical Japanese by Wixted. |
|
||||
03-08-2010, 05:22 PM
Quote:
You should focus on getting whatever lessons you're learning correct. My opinion is that you should drop MJC and google for Tae Kim's Japanese guide. Work through that. If you can learn everything there, you'll have learned pretty much everything you learn in a year and a half or two years of Japanese taught in American universities. |
|
||||
03-08-2010, 08:19 PM
I got an old college textbook and it mention 7 bases as well. It basically uses the godan and creates a couple of extra ones to explain exceptions such as 言わない, which comes off a little bit different from the regular negative base.
This happens when textbooks try to teach students using kana, but explaining things with romaji. If you simply use kana, there would be no need whatsoever to divide so many bases. But it took me a couple of years to understand that too LOL. 暗闇の中 歩くしかねぇ everything’s gonna be okay 恐れることねぇ 辛い時こそ胸を張れ |
|
|||
03-10-2010, 12:25 PM
@Kyle: I sortof learned hebrew that way. At first i was able to speak in sortof troll-hebrew, after about a month i was already speaking rather well.
I'm sure i can apply the same to japanese. Despite the fact I KNOW that MJC kind of sucks, i prefer it because it's actually interactive. it DEMANDS attention and input. books are kind of... there. The seven bases system is pretty easily programmable, so i could theoretically, after understanding this, build me a simple engine that uses only kana. edit: what i really want to see is sortof like godan past formal = base n+ending of choice |
Thread Tools | |
|
|