|
||||
07-25-2009, 06:00 PM
Quote:
|
|
||||
07-25-2009, 06:10 PM
I don't understand the second to last paragraph. Your American colleague abducted who?
I have an American friend in Japan going through a divorce (they have three kids) and he is now realizing that if he moves back to the US his soon-to-be ex can very easily not allow him to ever see his kids again. Very sad stuff. |
|
||||
07-25-2009, 11:18 PM
I know a number of guys who are divorced and now live in Japan doing low-end teaching jobs because it is the only way they will be able to see their kids at all. In some cases their ex-wives refuse to let them see the kids even though they are here, and in one case a guy has yet to meet his daughter as his wife and parents forced him to move out before the baby was born.
Unfortunately there seems to be quite a lot of that kind of thing. |
|
||||
07-26-2009, 02:45 AM
These are really unfortunate events, for the parents and the kids... But I think a lot of people have the tendency to forget there are two sides to every story. I don`t mean this as anything against Ozkai - but in general.
If you`re reading English accounts, they`re obviously going to be in favor or the writer - 99% of the time the foreign side of the relationship. But I would say there are just as many horror stories if looked at from the other side. I`ve had the misfortune to translate for quite a few divorce cases between foreigners and Japanese... And it`s never a straight story of "We broke up and he/she`s running off with the kids!" |
|
|||
07-26-2009, 03:47 AM
more on the The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. the convention makes sure that signatory countries have to send back a child/children to its previous country of residence if that country asks for it. refusal is possible
this means that japan or a japanese court does not have to send back an "abducted" child. there are plenty of these cases involving japan and many countries is putting continuous pressure on japan to become a signatory. japan has so far refused. [personal opinion]not japan's proudest moment[/personal opinion]. japan is the only G7-member not being a signatory. it is also the only "rich" country except for singapore that has not signed the convention. (pls, don't ask me for a definition on rich). ozkai, if she manages to leave australia for japan with your child chances that you will never see your child again are unfortunately very big. also keep in mind that it wouldn't surprise me if she could just get a new passport for both herself and your son again at the japanese embassy. this is not exclusive for japan. now, concerning your US colleague, what she did is against the hague convention and therefore the US, as a principle, will have to send back the child to japan if they request so. it is usually not to your advantage if you have abducted your child in a court. 蒼天(そうてん)翔(か)ける日輪(にちりん)の 青春の覇気 美(うるわ)しく 輝く我が名ぞ 阪神タイガース ※オウ オウ オウオウ 阪神タイガース フレ フレ フレフレ |
Thread Tools | |
|
|